TY - JOUR
T1 - Direct-to-participant investigational medicinal product supply in clinical trials in Europe
T2 - Exploring the experiences of sponsors, site staff and couriers
AU - de Jong, Amos J.
AU - Santa-Ana-Tellez, Yared
AU - Zuidgeest, Mira G.P.
AU - Grupstra, Renske J.
AU - Jami, Fatemeh
AU - de Boer, Anthonius
AU - Gardarsdottir, Helga
N1 - Funding Information:
This work has received support from the EU/EFPA Innovative Medicines Initiative Joint Undertaking Trials@Home (grant No 831458). The Innovative Medicines Initiative (IMI) website can be accessed through the following link: www.imi.europa.eu . The research leading to these results was conducted as part of the Trials@Home consortium. This paper only reflects the personal view of the stated authors and neither IMI nor the European Union, EFPIA or any Associated Partners are responsible for any use that may be made of the information contained herein. Funding information
Publisher Copyright:
© 2023 The Authors. British Journal of Clinical Pharmacology published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of British Pharmacological Society.
PY - 2023/12
Y1 - 2023/12
N2 - Aims: Insights into the current practice of direct-to-participant (DtP) supply of investigational medicinal product (IMP) in the context of clinical trials conducted in Europe are needed, as regulations are unharmonized. This study is set out to explore how DtP IMP supply has been employed in Europe and what the advantages and disadvantages and barriers and facilitators of its implementation are. Methods: We conducted semi-structured interviews with representatives from sponsor companies, courier services and site study staff involved in the IMP dispensing and delivery process in Europe. Interviews were conducted between May and November 2021, and data were analysed following thematic analysis. Results: Sixteen respondents participated in one of the 12 interviews. Respondents had experience with different models of DtP IMP supply including shipment from the investigative site, a central pharmacy (a depot under the control of a pharmacist) and a local pharmacy—aiming to reduce trial participation burden. The respondents indicated that investigative site-to-participant shipment is not affected by regulatory barriers, but could burden site staff. Shipment from central locations was considered most efficient, but possible regulatory barriers related to maintaining participants' privacy and investigator oversight were identified. The respondents indicated that the involvement of local pharmacies to dispense IMP can be considered when the IMP is authorized. Conclusions: Several DtP IMP supply models are implemented in clinical trials conducted in Europe. In this study, three main DtP IMP models were identified, which can be referenced when describing these approaches for regulatory approval.
AB - Aims: Insights into the current practice of direct-to-participant (DtP) supply of investigational medicinal product (IMP) in the context of clinical trials conducted in Europe are needed, as regulations are unharmonized. This study is set out to explore how DtP IMP supply has been employed in Europe and what the advantages and disadvantages and barriers and facilitators of its implementation are. Methods: We conducted semi-structured interviews with representatives from sponsor companies, courier services and site study staff involved in the IMP dispensing and delivery process in Europe. Interviews were conducted between May and November 2021, and data were analysed following thematic analysis. Results: Sixteen respondents participated in one of the 12 interviews. Respondents had experience with different models of DtP IMP supply including shipment from the investigative site, a central pharmacy (a depot under the control of a pharmacist) and a local pharmacy—aiming to reduce trial participation burden. The respondents indicated that investigative site-to-participant shipment is not affected by regulatory barriers, but could burden site staff. Shipment from central locations was considered most efficient, but possible regulatory barriers related to maintaining participants' privacy and investigator oversight were identified. The respondents indicated that the involvement of local pharmacies to dispense IMP can be considered when the IMP is authorized. Conclusions: Several DtP IMP supply models are implemented in clinical trials conducted in Europe. In this study, three main DtP IMP models were identified, which can be referenced when describing these approaches for regulatory approval.
KW - decentralized clinical trial
KW - direct-to-participant
KW - direct-to-patient
KW - DtP
KW - home delivery
KW - patient-centric
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85166632122&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1111/bcp.15850
DO - 10.1111/bcp.15850
M3 - Article
C2 - 37438875
AN - SCOPUS:85166632122
SN - 0306-5251
VL - 89
SP - 3512
EP - 3522
JO - British Journal of Clinical Pharmacology
JF - British Journal of Clinical Pharmacology
IS - 12
ER -