Diffusion of minimally invasive therapy in The Netherlands

Hindrik Vondeling*, Enria Haerkens, Ardine de Wit, Michael Bos, H. David Banta

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

Abstract

In the context of the European project, the diffusion of 10 selected cases of minimally invasive therapy (MIT) in the Dutch health care system was documented and analyzed. In each case the diffusion pattern resulting from the balance of stimulating and impeding factors is described, and summarized in a matrix framework. Budgetary pressures, lack of evidence on effectiveness and physician conservatism are the most important factors impeding diffusion of MIT. Patient demand, media reporting and presence of medical innovators are important diffusion-stimulating factors. Finally, a judgment is made on the policy implications of these findings, based on a comparison of the extent and speed of the diffusion of each case, the quality of evidence on effectiveness and cost-effectiveness and, in a few cases, existing policies. In most cases, more active policy making, either stimulating or otherwise guiding diffusion, would be desirable.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)67-81
Number of pages15
JournalHealth Policy
Volume23
Issue number1-2
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Jan 1993
Externally publishedYes

Keywords

  • Diffusion
  • Evaluation
  • Health policy
  • Innovation
  • Minimally invasive therapy
  • The Netherlands

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Diffusion of minimally invasive therapy in The Netherlands'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this