Differential association of [11C]PIB and [18F]FDDNP binding with cognitive impairment

  • N Tolboom*
  • , W M van der Flier
  • , M Yaqub
  • , T Koene
  • , R Boellaard
  • , A D Windhorst
  • , P Scheltens
  • , A A Lammertsma
  • , B N M van Berckel
  • *Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate associations of [(11)C]Pittsburgh compound B (PIB) and [(18)F]FDDNP with impairment in specific cognitive domains over the broader spectrum comprising cognitively normal elderly subjects, patients with mild cognitive impairment (MCI), and patients with Alzheimer disease (AD).

METHODS: Twelve patients with AD, 13 patients with MCI, and 15 cognitively normal elderly subjects were included. Paired [(11)C]PIB and [(18)F]FDDNP PET scans were performed in all subjects. Binding potential (BP(ND)) was calculated using parametric images of BP(ND) for global, frontal, parietal, and temporal cortex; medial temporal lobe; and posterior cingulate. Cognitive functions were assessed using a battery of neuropsychological tests. Linear regression analyses were used to assess associations of [(11)C]PIB and [(18)F]FDDNP binding with cognitive measures.

RESULTS: Adjusted for age, sex, and [(18)F]FDDNP binding, higher global [(11)C]PIB binding was associated with lower scores on the Mini-Mental State Examination, immediate and delayed recall of the Rey Auditory Verbal Learning Task (RAVLT), Visual Association Task, and Trail Making Test part B. Conversely, higher [(18)F]FDDNP binding was independently associated with lower scores on immediate recall of the RAVLT. After additional adjustment for diagnosis, higher [(11)C]PIB binding remained independently associated with delayed recall (standardized beta = -0.39, p = 0.01), whereas higher [(18)F]FDDNP binding remained independently associated with immediate recall (standardized beta = -0.32, p = 0.03). When regional binding was assessed using stepwise models, both increased frontal [(11)C]PIB and temporal [(18)F]FDDNP binding were associated with memory, whereas increased parietal [(11)C]PIB binding was associated with nonmemory functions.

CONCLUSION: Increased [(18)F]FDDNP binding is specifically associated with impairment of episodic memory, whereas increased [(11)C]Pittsburgh compound B binding is associated with impairment in a broader range of cognitive functions.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)2079-2085
Number of pages7
JournalNeurology
Volume73
Issue number24
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 15 Dec 2009
Externally publishedYes

Keywords

  • Aged
  • Alzheimer Disease/diagnosis
  • Aniline Compounds/metabolism
  • Brain/metabolism
  • Carbon Radioisotopes
  • Cognition Disorders/diagnosis
  • Female
  • Fluorine Radioisotopes
  • Humans
  • Linear Models
  • Magnetic Resonance Imaging
  • Male
  • Mental Recall
  • Middle Aged
  • Neuropsychological Tests
  • Nitriles/metabolism
  • Positron-Emission Tomography
  • Regression Analysis
  • Thiazoles/metabolism

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Differential association of [11C]PIB and [18F]FDDNP binding with cognitive impairment'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this