Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Dietary intake of total, heme and non-heme iron and the risk of colorectal cancer in a European prospective cohort study

  • Elom K. Aglago
  • , Amanda J. Cross
  • , Elio Riboli
  • , Veronika Fedirko
  • , David J. Hughes
  • , Agnes Fournier
  • , Paula Jakszyn
  • , Heinz Freisling
  • , Marc J. Gunter
  • , Christina C. Dahm
  • , Kim Overvad
  • , Anne Tjønneland
  • , Cecilie Kyrø
  • , Marie Christine Boutron-Ruault
  • , Joseph A. Rothwell
  • , Gianluca Severi
  • , Verena Katzke
  • , Bernard Srour
  • , Matthias B. Schulze
  • , Clemens Wittenbecher
  • Domenico Palli, Sabina Sieri, Fabrizio Pasanisi, Rosario Tumino, Fulvio Ricceri, Bas Bueno-de-Mesquita, Jeroen W.G. Derksen, Guri Skeie, Torill Enget Jensen, Marko Lukic, Maria Jose Sánchez, Pilar Amiano, Sandra Colorado-Yohar, Aurelio Barricarte, Ulrika Ericson, Bethany van Guelpen, Keren Papier, Anika Knuppel, Corinne Casagrande, Inge Huybrechts, Alicia K. Heath, Konstantinos K. Tsilidis, Mazda Jenab*
*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

Abstract

Background: Iron is an essential micronutrient with differing intake patterns and metabolism between men and women. Epidemiologic evidence on the association of dietary iron and its heme and non-heme components with colorectal cancer (CRC) development is inconclusive. Methods: We examined baseline dietary questionnaire-assessed intakes of total, heme, and non-heme iron and CRC risk in the EPIC cohort. Sex-specific multivariable-adjusted hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were computed using Cox regression. We modelled substitution of a 1 mg/day of heme iron intake with non-heme iron using the leave one-out method. Results: Of 450,105 participants (318,680 women) followed for 14.2 ± 4.0 years, 6162 (3511 women) developed CRC. In men, total iron intake was not associated with CRC risk (highest vs. lowest quintile, HRQ5vs.Q1:0.88; 95%CI:0.73, 1.06). An inverse association was observed for non-heme iron (HRQ5vs.Q1:0.80, 95%CI:0.67, 0.96) whereas heme iron showed a non-significant association (HRQ5vs.Q1:1.10; 95%CI:0.96, 1.27). In women, CRC risk was not associated with intakes of total (HRQ5vs.Q1:1.11, 95%CI:0.94, 1.31), heme (HRQ5vs.Q1:0.95; 95%CI:0.84, 1.07) or non-heme iron (HRQ5vs.Q1:1.03, 95%CI:0.88, 1.20). Substitution of heme with non-heme iron demonstrated lower CRC risk in men (HR:0.94; 95%CI: 0.89, 0.99). Conclusions: Our findings suggest potential sex-specific CRC risk associations for higher iron consumption that may differ by dietary sources.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1529-1540
Number of pages12
JournalBritish Journal of Cancer
Volume128
Issue number8
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 12 Apr 2023

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Dietary intake of total, heme and non-heme iron and the risk of colorectal cancer in a European prospective cohort study'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this