TY - JOUR
T1 - Diagnostic value of radiological staging and surveillance for T1 colorectal carcinomas
T2 - A multicenter cohort study
AU - Huisman, Jelle F
AU - Dang, Hao
AU - Moons, Leon M G
AU - Backes, Yara
AU - Dik, Vincent K
AU - Groen, John N
AU - Ter Borg, Frank
AU - van Bergeijk, Jeroen D
AU - Geesing, Joost M J
AU - Spanier, B W Marcel
AU - Terhaar Sive Droste, Joachim S
AU - Overwater, Anouk
AU - van Lelyveld, Niels
AU - Kessels, Koen
AU - Lacle, Miangela M
AU - Offerhaus, G Johan A
AU - Brohet, Richard M
AU - Knijn, Nikki
AU - Vleggaar, Frank P
AU - van Westreenen, Henderik L
AU - de Vos Tot Nederveen Cappel, Wouter H
AU - Boonstra, Jurjen J
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2023 The Authors. United European Gastroenterology Journal published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of United European Gastroenterology.
PY - 2023/7
Y1 - 2023/7
N2 - BACKGROUND: The role of radiological staging and surveillance imaging is under debate for T1 colorectal cancer (CRC) as the risk of distant metastases is low and imaging may lead to the detection of incidental findings.OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to evaluate the yield of radiological staging and surveillance imaging for T1 CRC.METHODS: In this retrospective multicenter cohort study, all patients of 10 Dutch hospitals with histologically proven T1 CRC who underwent radiological staging in the period 2000-2014 were included. Clinical characteristics, pathological, endoscopic, surgical and imaging reports at baseline and during follow-up were recorded and analyzed. Patients were classified as high-risk T1 CRC if at least one of the histological risk factors (lymphovascular invasion, poor tumor differentiation, deep submucosal invasion or positive resection margins) was present and as low-risk when all risk factors were absent.RESULTS: Of the 628 included patients, 3 (0.5%) had synchronous distant metastases, 13 (2.1%) malignant incidental findings and 129 (20.5%) benign incidental findings at baseline staging. Radiological surveillance was performed among 336 (53.5%) patients. The 5-year cumulative incidence of distant recurrence, malignant and benign incidental findings were 2.4% (95% confidence interval (CI): 1.1%-5.4%), 2.5% (95% CI: 0.6%-10.4%) and 18.3% (95% CI: 13.4%-24.7%), respectively. No distant metastatic events occurred among low-risk T1 CRC patients.CONCLUSION: The risk of synchronous distant metastases and distant recurrence in T1 CRC is low, while there is a substantial risk of detecting incidental findings. Radiological staging seems unnecessary prior to local excision of suspected T1 CRC and after local excision of low-risk T1 CRC. Radiological surveillance should not be performed in patients with low-risk T1 CRC.
AB - BACKGROUND: The role of radiological staging and surveillance imaging is under debate for T1 colorectal cancer (CRC) as the risk of distant metastases is low and imaging may lead to the detection of incidental findings.OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to evaluate the yield of radiological staging and surveillance imaging for T1 CRC.METHODS: In this retrospective multicenter cohort study, all patients of 10 Dutch hospitals with histologically proven T1 CRC who underwent radiological staging in the period 2000-2014 were included. Clinical characteristics, pathological, endoscopic, surgical and imaging reports at baseline and during follow-up were recorded and analyzed. Patients were classified as high-risk T1 CRC if at least one of the histological risk factors (lymphovascular invasion, poor tumor differentiation, deep submucosal invasion or positive resection margins) was present and as low-risk when all risk factors were absent.RESULTS: Of the 628 included patients, 3 (0.5%) had synchronous distant metastases, 13 (2.1%) malignant incidental findings and 129 (20.5%) benign incidental findings at baseline staging. Radiological surveillance was performed among 336 (53.5%) patients. The 5-year cumulative incidence of distant recurrence, malignant and benign incidental findings were 2.4% (95% confidence interval (CI): 1.1%-5.4%), 2.5% (95% CI: 0.6%-10.4%) and 18.3% (95% CI: 13.4%-24.7%), respectively. No distant metastatic events occurred among low-risk T1 CRC patients.CONCLUSION: The risk of synchronous distant metastases and distant recurrence in T1 CRC is low, while there is a substantial risk of detecting incidental findings. Radiological staging seems unnecessary prior to local excision of suspected T1 CRC and after local excision of low-risk T1 CRC. Radiological surveillance should not be performed in patients with low-risk T1 CRC.
KW - cohort study
KW - metastasis
KW - radiological follow-up
KW - radiological staging
KW - T1 colorectal cancer
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85163130463&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1002/ueg2.12403
DO - 10.1002/ueg2.12403
M3 - Article
C2 - 37300377
SN - 2050-6406
VL - 11
SP - 551
EP - 563
JO - United European Gastroenterology Journal
JF - United European Gastroenterology Journal
IS - 6
ER -