Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Diagnostic management of suspected acute pulmonary embolism in the postpartum period

  • Gurjeet Bhangu
  • , Sophie Greutert
  • , Helia Robert-Ebadi
  • , Jeffrey Kline
  • , Marc Righini
  • , Andrea Penaloza
  • , Arnaud Perrier
  • , Waleed Ghanima
  • , Ranjeeta Mallick
  • , Toshihiko Takada
  • , Nick van Es
  • , Frederikus A Klok
  • , Geert-Jan Geersing
  • , Grégoire Le Gal
  • , Leslie Skeith*
  • *Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

Abstract

Background Pregnancy and the postpartum period increase the risk of venous thromboembolism including pulmonary embolism (PE), which is an important cause of maternal morbidity and mortality. While diagnostic strategies for suspected PE in pregnancy have evolved, postpartum patients remain underrepresented in research. Objectives This study evaluated diagnostic strategies and the incidence of PE among postpartum patients presenting to an acute care setting with suspected PE, using data from a previously published individual patient data meta-analysis. Methods We analyzed 201 postpartum patients from 6 studies included in the individual patient data meta-analysis. Primary outcomes were PE incidence and a description of the diagnostic tests used. Secondary outcomes included the performance of retrospectively calculated clinical decision rules (CDRs) including the revised Geneva score, pregnancy-adapted Geneva (PAG) score, and pulmonary embolism rule-out criteria (PERC), in combination with D-dimer testing and imaging. Results Among 201 postpartum patients with suspected PE, the incidence was 6.0% (95% CI, 2.9%-12.3%). The revised Geneva and PERC CDRs performed similarly to previously published data. Notably, 29% (29/100, 95% CI, 21%-39%) of postpartum patients had a negative D-dimer result, and none of those with a negative result were diagnosed with PE, regardless of the CDR used. Conclusion The observed PE incidence of 6.0% in this postpartum cohort underscores the need for evidence-based diagnostic pathways for physicians. Given that 29% of patients had a negative D-dimer and none were diagnosed with PE, diagnostic algorithms incorporating D-dimer testing could be applied in postpartum evaluations.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)2992-3001
Number of pages10
JournalJournal of thrombosis and haemostasis : JTH
Volume24
Issue number8
Early online date19 May 2026
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Aug 2026

Keywords

  • D-dimer
  • postpartum period
  • pulmonary embolism

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Diagnostic management of suspected acute pulmonary embolism in the postpartum period'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this