Abstract
BACKGROUND: Needle-localized open breast biopsy (NLBB) is considered the gold standard procedure for the diagnosis of impalpable breast disease. In an observational follow-up study the sensitivity and negative predictive value of this procedure was determined in a clinical population with long-term follow-up.
METHODS: Some 199 consecutive patients with a benign histological diagnosis on NLBB were followed for the occurrence of breast cancer, using information from the Dutch National Morbid-Anatomical Record Department. Based on a review of mammograms and histological slides, an expert panel decided whether the carcinomas detected during follow-up were newly developed, or were present already at the time of the NLBB.
RESULTS: After a median follow-up of 60.5 months, seven carcinomas were detected. At panel review, six appeared to have been missed by NLBB. The sensitivity of NLBB was 99 per cent after 2 years of follow-up, but dropped to 96 per cent after 5 years. Similarly, the negative predictive value dropped from 99 per cent after 2 years to 94 per cent after 5 years of follow-up.
CONCLUSION: NLBB is an accurate diagnostic procedure for the evaluation of impalpable breast disease. However, with longer follow-up the accuracy becomes lower than generally reported.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 344-347 |
| Number of pages | 4 |
| Journal | British Journal of Surgery |
| Volume | 87 |
| Issue number | 3 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - 2000 |
Keywords
- Adult
- Aged
- Aged, 80 and over
- Biopsy, Needle
- Breast
- Breast Diseases
- Female
- Follow-Up Studies
- Humans
- Middle Aged
- Palpation
- Sensitivity and Specificity
- Journal Article
- Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Diagnostic accuracy of needle-localized open breast biopsy for impalpable breast disease'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver