Development of a decision aid for the treatment of benign prostatic hyperplasia: A four stage method using a Delphi consensus study

Romy E D Lamers*, Maarten Cuypers, Mirjam M. Garvelink, J. L H Ruud Bosch, Paul J M Kil

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

Abstract

Objective: To develop a web-based decision aid (DA) for the treatment of lower urinary tract symptoms due to benign prostatic hyperplasia (LUTS/BPH). Methods: From February-September 2014 we performed a four-stage development method: 1: Two-round Delphi consensus method among urologists, 2: Identifying patients' needs and expectations, 3: Development of DA content and structure, 4: Usability testing with LUTS/BPH patients. Results: 1 (N = 15): Dutch urologists reached consensus on 61% of the statements concerning users' criteria, decision options, structure, and medical content. 2 (N = 24): Consensus was reached in 69% on statements concerning the need for improvement of information provision, the need for DA development and that the DA should clarify patients' preferences. 3: DA development based on results from stage 1 and stage 2. 4 (N = 10): Pros of the DA were clear information provision, systematic design and easy to read and re-read. Conclusion: A LUTS/BPH DA containing VCEs. ** **Values Clarification Exercises. was developed in cooperation with urologists and patients following a structured 4 stage method and was stated to be well accepted. Practice Implications: This method can be adopted for the development of DAs to support other medical decision issues.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1249-1256
JournalPatient Education and Counseling
Volume99
Issue number7
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Jul 2016

Keywords

  • Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia
  • Decision Aid
  • Decision Aid development
  • Delphi consensus study

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Development of a decision aid for the treatment of benign prostatic hyperplasia: A four stage method using a Delphi consensus study'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this