TY - JOUR
T1 - Development of a decision aid for the treatment of benign prostatic hyperplasia
T2 - A four stage method using a Delphi consensus study
AU - Lamers, Romy E D
AU - Cuypers, Maarten
AU - Garvelink, Mirjam M.
AU - Bosch, J. L H Ruud
AU - Kil, Paul J M
PY - 2016/7/1
Y1 - 2016/7/1
N2 - Objective: To develop a web-based decision aid (DA) for the treatment of lower urinary tract symptoms due to benign prostatic hyperplasia (LUTS/BPH). Methods: From February-September 2014 we performed a four-stage development method: 1: Two-round Delphi consensus method among urologists, 2: Identifying patients' needs and expectations, 3: Development of DA content and structure, 4: Usability testing with LUTS/BPH patients. Results: 1 (N = 15): Dutch urologists reached consensus on 61% of the statements concerning users' criteria, decision options, structure, and medical content. 2 (N = 24): Consensus was reached in 69% on statements concerning the need for improvement of information provision, the need for DA development and that the DA should clarify patients' preferences. 3: DA development based on results from stage 1 and stage 2. 4 (N = 10): Pros of the DA were clear information provision, systematic design and easy to read and re-read. Conclusion: A LUTS/BPH DA containing VCEs. ** **Values Clarification Exercises. was developed in cooperation with urologists and patients following a structured 4 stage method and was stated to be well accepted. Practice Implications: This method can be adopted for the development of DAs to support other medical decision issues.
AB - Objective: To develop a web-based decision aid (DA) for the treatment of lower urinary tract symptoms due to benign prostatic hyperplasia (LUTS/BPH). Methods: From February-September 2014 we performed a four-stage development method: 1: Two-round Delphi consensus method among urologists, 2: Identifying patients' needs and expectations, 3: Development of DA content and structure, 4: Usability testing with LUTS/BPH patients. Results: 1 (N = 15): Dutch urologists reached consensus on 61% of the statements concerning users' criteria, decision options, structure, and medical content. 2 (N = 24): Consensus was reached in 69% on statements concerning the need for improvement of information provision, the need for DA development and that the DA should clarify patients' preferences. 3: DA development based on results from stage 1 and stage 2. 4 (N = 10): Pros of the DA were clear information provision, systematic design and easy to read and re-read. Conclusion: A LUTS/BPH DA containing VCEs. ** **Values Clarification Exercises. was developed in cooperation with urologists and patients following a structured 4 stage method and was stated to be well accepted. Practice Implications: This method can be adopted for the development of DAs to support other medical decision issues.
KW - Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia
KW - Decision Aid
KW - Decision Aid development
KW - Delphi consensus study
UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/84958279928
U2 - 10.1016/j.pec.2016.02.004
DO - 10.1016/j.pec.2016.02.004
M3 - Article
C2 - 26899631
AN - SCOPUS:84958279928
SN - 0738-3991
VL - 99
SP - 1249
EP - 1256
JO - Patient Education and Counseling
JF - Patient Education and Counseling
IS - 7
ER -