TY - JOUR
T1 - Determining the safety of ultrafocal salvage high-dose-rate brachytherapy for radiorecurrent prostate cancer
T2 - A toxicity assessment of 150 patients
AU - van Son, Marieke
AU - Peters, Max
AU - Moerland, Marinus
AU - van de Pol, Sandrine
AU - Eppinga, Wietse
AU - Lagendijk, Jan
AU - van der Voort van Zyp, Jochem
N1 - Funding Information:
This work was supported by the Dutch Cancer Sociey (KWF Kankerbestrijding) [grant number 10932 ]. The funding source had no involvement in study design, in the collection, analysis or interpretation of data, in the writing of the report or in the decision to submit the article for publication.
Funding Information:
M. Peters: received a grant by the Dutch Cancer Sociey (KWF Kankerbestrijding) [grant number 10932].
Publisher Copyright:
© 2020 The Author(s)
PY - 2021/3
Y1 - 2021/3
N2 - Background and purpose: Local re-treatment of radiorecurrent prostate cancer is potentially curative. However, the increased risk of severe toxicity may outweigh the opportunity of cancer control. This study aims to evaluate treatment-related toxicity from ultrafocal salvage high-dose-rate brachytherapy (HDR-BT) and to investigate potential risk factors.Materials and methods: Toxicity data from 150 treated patients (July 2013-November 2019) was collected from a prospective registry. The treatment aim was to deliver a single dose of 19 Gy to the recurrent lesion as identified on multiparametric MRI and PET-CT. Treating physicians graded genitourinary (GU) and gastro-intestinal (GI) toxicity and erectile dysfunction (ED) using the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) 4.0, at baseline and during follow-up. Domains with substantial (≥10%) new-onset grade ≥ 2 toxicity were further evaluated using mixed effects logistic regression to find potential risk factors.Results: Median follow-up time was 20 months (IQR 12-31). Over time, new-onset grade 2 and 3 toxicity was recorded in 41% and 3% (GU), 5% and 0% (GI) and 22% and 15% (ED). While GI toxicity remained stably low, grade ≥ 2 GU toxicity and ED were seen twice as frequent in the late phase (>3 months after treatment). Significant risk factors for grade ≥ 2 toxicity were baseline GU toxicity (grade ≥ 2), baseline ED (grade ≥ 2), IPSS (cut-off ≥ 14) and urethral dose (D10%, cut-off ≥ 17 Gy).Conclusion: Ultrafocal salvage HDR-BT is a safe re-treatment option, especially in patients with a favorable symptom profile at baseline. Adherence to urethral dose constraints is important to avoid GU toxicity.
AB - Background and purpose: Local re-treatment of radiorecurrent prostate cancer is potentially curative. However, the increased risk of severe toxicity may outweigh the opportunity of cancer control. This study aims to evaluate treatment-related toxicity from ultrafocal salvage high-dose-rate brachytherapy (HDR-BT) and to investigate potential risk factors.Materials and methods: Toxicity data from 150 treated patients (July 2013-November 2019) was collected from a prospective registry. The treatment aim was to deliver a single dose of 19 Gy to the recurrent lesion as identified on multiparametric MRI and PET-CT. Treating physicians graded genitourinary (GU) and gastro-intestinal (GI) toxicity and erectile dysfunction (ED) using the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) 4.0, at baseline and during follow-up. Domains with substantial (≥10%) new-onset grade ≥ 2 toxicity were further evaluated using mixed effects logistic regression to find potential risk factors.Results: Median follow-up time was 20 months (IQR 12-31). Over time, new-onset grade 2 and 3 toxicity was recorded in 41% and 3% (GU), 5% and 0% (GI) and 22% and 15% (ED). While GI toxicity remained stably low, grade ≥ 2 GU toxicity and ED were seen twice as frequent in the late phase (>3 months after treatment). Significant risk factors for grade ≥ 2 toxicity were baseline GU toxicity (grade ≥ 2), baseline ED (grade ≥ 2), IPSS (cut-off ≥ 14) and urethral dose (D10%, cut-off ≥ 17 Gy).Conclusion: Ultrafocal salvage HDR-BT is a safe re-treatment option, especially in patients with a favorable symptom profile at baseline. Adherence to urethral dose constraints is important to avoid GU toxicity.
KW - CTCAE 4.0
KW - Focal salvage therapy
KW - Local recurrence
KW - Prostate cancer
KW - Toxicity
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85099519380&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.ctro.2020.12.002
DO - 10.1016/j.ctro.2020.12.002
M3 - Article
C2 - 33364450
SN - 2405-6308
VL - 27
SP - 1
EP - 7
JO - Clinical and translational radiation oncology
JF - Clinical and translational radiation oncology
ER -