Detection of fetal chromosomal anomalies: Does nuchal translucency measurement have added value in the era of non-invasive prenatal testing?

K. D. Lichtenbelt, B. D M Diemel, M. P H Koster, G. T R Manten, J. Siljee, G. H. Schuring-Blom, G. C M L Page-Christiaens*

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

1 Citation (Scopus)

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: The objective of this study is to determine what percentage of fetal chromosomal anomalies remains undetected when first trimester combined testing is replaced by non-invasive prenatal testing for trisomies 13, 18, and 21. We focused on the added clinical value of nuchal translucency (NT) measurement.

METHODS: Data on fetal karyotype, ultrasound findings, and pregnancy outcome of all pregnancies with an NT measurement ≥3.5 mm were retrospectively collected from a cohort of 25,057 singleton pregnancies in which first trimester combined testing was performed.

RESULTS: Two hundred twenty-five fetuses (0.9 %) had an NT ≥3.5 mm. In 24 of these pregnancies, a chromosomal anomaly other than trisomy 13, 18, or 21 was detected. Eleven resulted in fetal demise, and ten showed fetal ultrasound anomalies. In three fetuses with normal ultrasound findings, a chromosomal anomaly was detected, of which one was a triple X.

CONCLUSIONS: In three out of 25,057 pregnancies (0.01%), non-invasive prenatal testing and fetal ultrasound would have missed a chromosomal anomaly that would have been identified by NT measurement.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)663-668
Number of pages6
JournalPrenatal Diagnosis
Volume35
Issue number7
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Jan 2015

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Detection of fetal chromosomal anomalies: Does nuchal translucency measurement have added value in the era of non-invasive prenatal testing?'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this