Detectability of Medication Errors With a STOPP/START-Based Medication Review in Older People Prior to a Potentially Preventable Drug-Related Hospital Admission

Bastiaan T G M Sallevelt, Toine C G Egberts, Corlina J A Huibers, Jimmy Ietswaart, A Clara Drenth-van Maanen, Emma Jennings, Cian O'Mahony, Katharina Tabea Jungo, Martin Feller, Nicolas Rodondi, François-Xavier Sibille, Anne Spinewine, Eugène P van Puijenbroek, Ingeborg Wilting, Wilma Knol

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

8 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

Introduction: Multimorbidity and polypharmacy are risk factors for drug-related hospital admissions (DRAs) in the ageing population. DRAs caused by medication errors (MEs) are considered potentially preventable. The STOPP/START criteria were developed to detect potential MEs in older people. Objective: The aim of this study was to assess the detectability of MEs with a STOPP/START-based in-hospital medication review in older people with polypharmacy and multimorbidity prior to a potentially preventable DRA. Methods: Hospitalised older patients (n = 963) with polypharmacy and multimorbidity from the intervention arm of the OPERAM trial received a STOPP/START-based in-hospital medication review by a pharmacotherapy team. Readmissions within 1 year after the in-hospital medication review were adjudicated for drug-relatedness. A retrospective assessment was performed to determine whether MEs identified at the first DRA were detectable during the in-hospital medication review. Results: In total, 84 of 963 OPERAM intervention patients (8.7%) were readmitted with a potentially preventable DRA, of which 72 patients (n = 77 MEs) were eligible for analysis. About half (48%, n = 37/77) of the MEs were not present during the in-hospital medication review and therefore were not detectable at that time. The pharmacotherapy team recommended a change in medication regimen in 50% (n = 20/40) of present MEs, which corresponds to 26% (n = 20/77) of the total identified MEs at readmission. However, these recommendations were not implemented. Conclusion: MEs identified at readmission were not addressed by a prior single in-hospital medication review because either these MEs occurred after the medication review (~50%), or no recommendation was given during the medication review (~25%), or the recommendation was not implemented (~25%). Future research should focus on optimisation of the timing and frequency of medication review and the implementation of proposed medication recommendations. Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT02986425. December 8, 2016. Funding: European Union HORIZON 2020, Swiss State Secretariat for Education, Research and Innovation (SERI), Swiss National Science Foundation (SNSF) Graphical abstract: [Figure not available: see fulltext.].

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1501-1516
Number of pages16
JournalDrug Safety
Volume45
Issue number12
Early online date1 Nov 2022
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Dec 2022

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Detectability of Medication Errors With a STOPP/START-Based Medication Review in Older People Prior to a Potentially Preventable Drug-Related Hospital Admission'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this