Designing pragmatic trials—what can we learn from lessons learned?

Rolf H.H. Groenwold*, Olaf M Dekkers

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalComment/Letter to the editorAcademicpeer-review

Abstract

Pragmatic trials aim to inform clinical decision making by measuring the effect of a treatment in clinical practice. The purpose of the PRECIS-2 tool is to support in designing a truly pragmatic trial. We comment on a study by Forbes et al., who assessed the applicability of the PRECIS-2 tool. The tool will prove particularly useful when implemented in the process of trial design. However, it is yet unclear how e.g., possible dependencies between PRECIS domains, or conducting a pragmatic trial within an existing data registry (e.g., electronic health records) affect the applicability of the tool.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)3-5
Number of pages3
JournalJournal of Clinical Epidemiology
Volume90
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Oct 2017

Keywords

  • Pragmatic trial
  • Randomised trial

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Designing pragmatic trials—what can we learn from lessons learned?'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this