Abstract

The authors of the paper 'Advance euthanasia directives: a controversial case and its ethical implications' articulate concerns and reasons with regard to the conduct of euthanasia in persons with dementia based on advance directives. While we agree on the conclusion that there needs to be more attention for such directives in the preparation phase, we disagree with the reasons provided by the authors to support their conclusions. We will outline two concerns with their reasoning by drawing on empirical research and by providing reasons that contradict their assumptions about competence of people with dementia and the (un)importance of happiness in reasoning about advance directives of people with dementia. We will draw attention to the important normative questions that have been overstepped in their paper, and we will outline why further research is required.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)92-94
Number of pages3
JournalJournal of Medical Ethics
Volume45
Issue number2
Early online date15 Jun 2018
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Feb 2019

Keywords

  • competence/incompetence
  • dementia
  • ethics
  • euthanasia
  • living wills/advance directives

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Dementia and advance directives: some empirical and normative concerns'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this