TY - JOUR
T1 - Delayed breast cancer diagnosis after repeated recall at biennial screening mammography
T2 - an observational follow-up study from the Netherlands
AU - Lameijer, Joost R C
AU - Voogd, Adri C
AU - Pijnappel, Ruud M
AU - Setz-Pels, Wikke
AU - Broeders, Mireille J
AU - Tjan-Heijnen, Vivianne C G
AU - Duijm, Lucien E M
N1 - Funding Information:
Funding information This research is funded by The Dutch Health Care Insurance Board, which also finances and provides national coordination for the breast cancer screening program.
Publisher Copyright:
© 2020, The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Cancer Research UK.
Copyright:
Copyright 2020 Elsevier B.V., All rights reserved.
PY - 2020/7/21
Y1 - 2020/7/21
N2 - Background: Delay in detection of breast cancer may worsen tumour characteristics, with progression of tumour size and a higher risk of metastatic lymph nodes. The purpose of this study was to investigate delayed breast cancer diagnosis after repeated recall for the same mammographic abnormality at screening. Methods: This was a retrospective study performed in two cohorts of women enrolled in a mammography screening programme in the Netherlands. All women aged 50−75 who underwent biennial screening mammography either between January 1, 1997 and December 31, 2006 (cohort 1) or between January 1, 2007 and December 31, 2016 (cohort 2) were included. Results: The cohorts showed no difference in proportions of women with delayed breast cancer diagnosis of at least 2 years (2.2% versus 2.8%, P = 0.29). Most delays were caused by incorrect BI-RADS classifications after recall (74.2%). An increase in mean tumour size was seen when comparing sizes at initial false-negative recall and at diagnosis of breast cancer (P < 0.001). Conclusions: The proportion of women with a long delay in breast cancer confirmation following repeated recall at screening mammography has not decreased during 20 years of screening. These delays lead to larger tumour size at detection and may negatively influence prognosis.
AB - Background: Delay in detection of breast cancer may worsen tumour characteristics, with progression of tumour size and a higher risk of metastatic lymph nodes. The purpose of this study was to investigate delayed breast cancer diagnosis after repeated recall for the same mammographic abnormality at screening. Methods: This was a retrospective study performed in two cohorts of women enrolled in a mammography screening programme in the Netherlands. All women aged 50−75 who underwent biennial screening mammography either between January 1, 1997 and December 31, 2006 (cohort 1) or between January 1, 2007 and December 31, 2016 (cohort 2) were included. Results: The cohorts showed no difference in proportions of women with delayed breast cancer diagnosis of at least 2 years (2.2% versus 2.8%, P = 0.29). Most delays were caused by incorrect BI-RADS classifications after recall (74.2%). An increase in mean tumour size was seen when comparing sizes at initial false-negative recall and at diagnosis of breast cancer (P < 0.001). Conclusions: The proportion of women with a long delay in breast cancer confirmation following repeated recall at screening mammography has not decreased during 20 years of screening. These delays lead to larger tumour size at detection and may negatively influence prognosis.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85084453698&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1038/s41416-020-0870-2
DO - 10.1038/s41416-020-0870-2
M3 - Article
C2 - 32390006
SN - 0007-0920
VL - 123
SP - 325
EP - 332
JO - British Journal of Cancer
JF - British Journal of Cancer
IS - 2
ER -