TY - JOUR
T1 - Definitions of hospital-acquired pneumonia in trauma research
T2 - a systematic review
AU - Kobes, Tim
AU - Smeeing, Diederik P.J.
AU - Hietbrink, Falco
AU - Benders, Kim E.M.
AU - Houwert, R. Marijn
AU - van Baal, Mark P.C.M.
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© The Author(s) 2024.
PY - 2024/10
Y1 - 2024/10
N2 - Purpose: What are reported definitions of HAP in trauma patient research? Methods: A systematic review was performed using the PubMed/MEDLINE database. We included all English, Dutch, and German original research papers in adult trauma patients reporting diagnostic criteria for hospital-acquired pneumonia diagnosis. The risk of bias was assessed using the MINORS criteria. Results: Forty-six out of 5749 non-duplicate studies were included. Forty-seven unique criteria were reported and divided into five categories: clinical, laboratory, microbiological, radiologic, and miscellaneous. Eighteen studies used 33 unique guideline criteria; 28 studies used 36 unique non-guideline criteria. Conclusion: Clinical criteria for diagnosing HAP—both guideline and non-guideline—are widespread with no clear consensus, leading to restrictions in adequately comparing the available literature on HAP in trauma patients. Studies should at least report how a diagnosis was made, but preferably, they would use pre-defined guideline criteria for pneumonia diagnosis in a research setting. Ideally, one internationally accepted set of criteria is used to diagnose hospital-acquired pneumonia. Level of evidence: Level III.
AB - Purpose: What are reported definitions of HAP in trauma patient research? Methods: A systematic review was performed using the PubMed/MEDLINE database. We included all English, Dutch, and German original research papers in adult trauma patients reporting diagnostic criteria for hospital-acquired pneumonia diagnosis. The risk of bias was assessed using the MINORS criteria. Results: Forty-six out of 5749 non-duplicate studies were included. Forty-seven unique criteria were reported and divided into five categories: clinical, laboratory, microbiological, radiologic, and miscellaneous. Eighteen studies used 33 unique guideline criteria; 28 studies used 36 unique non-guideline criteria. Conclusion: Clinical criteria for diagnosing HAP—both guideline and non-guideline—are widespread with no clear consensus, leading to restrictions in adequately comparing the available literature on HAP in trauma patients. Studies should at least report how a diagnosis was made, but preferably, they would use pre-defined guideline criteria for pneumonia diagnosis in a research setting. Ideally, one internationally accepted set of criteria is used to diagnose hospital-acquired pneumonia. Level of evidence: Level III.
KW - Clinical definition
KW - Diagnosis
KW - Diagnostic criteria
KW - Guideline criteria
KW - Hospital-acquired pneumonia
KW - Trauma patient research
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85188949422&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1007/s00068-024-02509-8
DO - 10.1007/s00068-024-02509-8
M3 - Review article
C2 - 38546856
AN - SCOPUS:85188949422
SN - 1863-9933
VL - 50
SP - 2005
EP - 2015
JO - European Journal of Trauma and Emergency Surgery
JF - European Journal of Trauma and Emergency Surgery
IS - 5
ER -