TY - JOUR
T1 - Definitions and treatment of oligometastatic oesophagogastric cancer according to multidisciplinary tumour boards in Europe
AU - Kroese, Tiuri E.
AU - van Hillegersberg, Richard
AU - Schoppmann, Sebastian
AU - Deseyne, Pieter R.A.J.
AU - Nafteux, Philippe
AU - Obermannova, Radka
AU - Nordsmark, Marianne
AU - Pfeiffer, Per
AU - Hawkings, Maria A.
AU - Smyth, Elizabeth
AU - Markar, Sheraz
AU - Hanna, George B.
AU - Cheong, Edward
AU - Chaudry, Asif
AU - Elme, Anneli
AU - Adenis, Antoine
AU - Piessen, Guillaume
AU - Gani, Cihan
AU - Bruns, Christiane J.
AU - Moehler, Markus
AU - Liakakos, Theodore
AU - Reynolds, John
AU - Morganti, Alessio
AU - Rosati, Riccardo
AU - Castoro, Carlo
AU - D'Ugo, Domenico
AU - Roviello, Franco
AU - Bencivenga, Maria
AU - de Manzoni, Giovanni
AU - Jeene, Paul
AU - van Sandick, Johanna W.
AU - Muijs, Christel
AU - Slingerland, Marije
AU - Nieuwenhuijzen, Grard
AU - Wijnhoven, Bas
AU - Beerepoot, Laurens V.
AU - Kolodziejczyk, Piotr
AU - Polkowski, Wojciech P.
AU - Alsina, Maria
AU - Pera, Manuel
AU - Kanonnikoff, Tania F.
AU - Nilsson, Magnus
AU - Guckenberger, Matthias
AU - Monig, Stefan
AU - Wagner, Dorethea
AU - Wyrwicz, Lucjan
AU - Berbee, Maaike
AU - van Rossum, Peter S.N.
AU - Mazza, Elena
AU - Lips, Irene
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2022 The Authors
PY - 2022/3
Y1 - 2022/3
N2 - Background: Consensus about the definition and treatment of oligometastatic oesophagogastric cancer is lacking. Objective: To assess the definition and treatment of oligometastatic oesophagogastric cancer across multidisciplinary tumour boards (MDTs) in Europe. Material and methods: European expert centers (n = 49) were requested to discuss 15 real-life cases in their MDT with at least a medical, surgical, and radiation oncologist present. The cases varied in terms of location and number of metastases, histology, timing of detection (i.e. synchronous versus metachronous), primary tumour treatment status, and response to systemic therapy. The primary outcome was the agreement in the definition of oligometastatic disease at diagnosis and after systemic therapy. The secondary outcome was the agreement in treatment strategies. Treatment strategies for oligometastatic disease were categorised into upfront local treatment (i.e. metastasectomy or stereotactic radiotherapy), systemic therapy followed by restaging to consider local treatment or systemic therapy alone. The agreement across MDTs was scored to be either absent/poor (<50%), fair (50%–75%), or consensus (≥75%). Results: A total of 47 MDTs across 16 countries fully discussed the cases (96%). Oligometastatic disease was considered in patients with 1–2 metastases in either the liver, lung, retroperitoneal lymph nodes, adrenal gland, soft tissue or bone (consensus). At follow-up, oligometastatic disease was considered after a median of 18 weeks of systemic therapy when no progression or progression in size only of the oligometastatic lesion(s) was seen (consensus). If at restaging after a median of 18 weeks of systemic therapy the number of lesions progressed, this was not considered as oligometastatic disease (fair agreement). There was no consensus on treatment strategies for oligometastatic disease. Conclusion: A broad consensus on definitions of oligometastatic oesophagogastric cancer was found among MDTs of oesophagogastric cancer expert centres in Europe. However, high practice variability in treatment strategies exists.
AB - Background: Consensus about the definition and treatment of oligometastatic oesophagogastric cancer is lacking. Objective: To assess the definition and treatment of oligometastatic oesophagogastric cancer across multidisciplinary tumour boards (MDTs) in Europe. Material and methods: European expert centers (n = 49) were requested to discuss 15 real-life cases in their MDT with at least a medical, surgical, and radiation oncologist present. The cases varied in terms of location and number of metastases, histology, timing of detection (i.e. synchronous versus metachronous), primary tumour treatment status, and response to systemic therapy. The primary outcome was the agreement in the definition of oligometastatic disease at diagnosis and after systemic therapy. The secondary outcome was the agreement in treatment strategies. Treatment strategies for oligometastatic disease were categorised into upfront local treatment (i.e. metastasectomy or stereotactic radiotherapy), systemic therapy followed by restaging to consider local treatment or systemic therapy alone. The agreement across MDTs was scored to be either absent/poor (<50%), fair (50%–75%), or consensus (≥75%). Results: A total of 47 MDTs across 16 countries fully discussed the cases (96%). Oligometastatic disease was considered in patients with 1–2 metastases in either the liver, lung, retroperitoneal lymph nodes, adrenal gland, soft tissue or bone (consensus). At follow-up, oligometastatic disease was considered after a median of 18 weeks of systemic therapy when no progression or progression in size only of the oligometastatic lesion(s) was seen (consensus). If at restaging after a median of 18 weeks of systemic therapy the number of lesions progressed, this was not considered as oligometastatic disease (fair agreement). There was no consensus on treatment strategies for oligometastatic disease. Conclusion: A broad consensus on definitions of oligometastatic oesophagogastric cancer was found among MDTs of oesophagogastric cancer expert centres in Europe. However, high practice variability in treatment strategies exists.
KW - Gastric neoplasm
KW - Metastasectomy
KW - Neoplasm metastasis
KW - Oesophageal neoplasm
KW - Oligometastasis
KW - Radiosurgery
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85124098984&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.ejca.2021.11.032
DO - 10.1016/j.ejca.2021.11.032
M3 - Article
C2 - 35134666
SN - 0959-8049
VL - 164
SP - 18
EP - 29
JO - European Journal of Cancer
JF - European Journal of Cancer
ER -