TY - JOUR
T1 - Defining the Key Competencies in Radiation Protection for Endovascular Procedures
T2 - A Multispecialty Delphi Consensus Study
AU - Doyen, Bart
AU - Maurel, Blandine
AU - Cole, Jonathan
AU - Maertens, Heidi
AU - Mastracci, Tara
AU - Van Herzeele, Isabelle
AU - Bech, Bo
AU - Bertoglio, Luca
AU - Bicknell, Colin
AU - Brodmann, Marianne
AU - Carrell, Tom
AU - Cohnert, Tina
AU - De Graaf, Rick
AU - De Vries, Jean Paul
AU - Dick, Florian
AU - Fanelli, Fabrizio
AU - Ferraresi, Roberto
AU - Gouëffic, Yann
AU - Haulon, Stéphan
AU - Karkos, Christos
AU - Končar, Igor
AU - Lachat, Mário
AU - Lammer, Johannes
AU - Lockie, Tim
AU - McWilliams, Richard
AU - Melissano, Germano
AU - Müller-Hülsbeck, Stefan
AU - Nienaber, Christoph
AU - O'Sullivan,
AU - Panuccio, Giuseppe
AU - Resch, Timothy
AU - Riambau, Vincente
AU - Williams, Robin
AU - Sievert, Horst
AU - Stockx, Luc
AU - Szeberin, Zoltán
AU - Teijink, Joep
AU - Gonçalves Dias, Paulo
AU - Van Den Berg, Josua
AU - Van Der Heyden, Jan
AU - van Herwaarden, Joost
AU - Vermassen, Frank
AU - Verzini, Fabio
AU - Wanhainen, Anders
N1 - Funding Information:
I. Van Herzeele is supported by a Senior Clinical Fellowship of the Fund for Scientific Research – Flanders, Belgium. Appendix A
Publisher Copyright:
© 2017 European Society for Vascular Surgery. All rights reserved.
PY - 2018/2
Y1 - 2018/2
N2 - Objectives: Radiation protection training courses currently focus on broad knowledge topics which may not always be relevant in daily practice. The goal of this study was to determine the key competencies in radiation protection that every endovascular team member should possess and apply routinely, through multispecialty clinical content expert consensus. Methods: Consensus was obtained through a two round modified Delphi methodology. The expert panel consisted of European vascular surgeons, interventional radiologists, and interventional cardiologists/angiologists experienced in endovascular procedures. An initial list of statements, covering knowledge skills, technical skills and attitudes was created, based on a literature search. Additional statements could be suggested by the experts in the first Delphi round. Each of the statements had to be rated on a 5- point Likert scale. A statement was considered to be a key competency when the internal consistency was greater than alpha = 0.80 and at least 80% of the experts agreed (rating 4/5) or strongly agreed (rating 5/5) with the statement. Questionnaires were emailed to panel members using the Surveymonkey service. Results: Forty-one of 65 (63.1%) invited experts agreed to participate in the study. The response rates were 36 out of 41 (87.8%): overall 38 out of 41(92.6%) in the first round and 36 out of 38 (94.7%) in the second round. The 71 primary statements were supplemented with nine items suggested by the panel. The results showed excellent consensus among responders (Cronbach's alpha = 0.937 first round; 0.958 s round). Experts achieved a consensus that 30 of 33 knowledge skills (90.9%), 23 of 27 technical skills (82.1%), and 15 of 20 attitudes (75.0%) should be considered as key competencies. Conclusions: A multispecialty European endovascular expert panel reached consensus about the key competencies in radiation protection. These results may serve to create practical and relevant radiation protection training courses in the future, enhancing radiation safety for both patients and the entire endovascular team.
AB - Objectives: Radiation protection training courses currently focus on broad knowledge topics which may not always be relevant in daily practice. The goal of this study was to determine the key competencies in radiation protection that every endovascular team member should possess and apply routinely, through multispecialty clinical content expert consensus. Methods: Consensus was obtained through a two round modified Delphi methodology. The expert panel consisted of European vascular surgeons, interventional radiologists, and interventional cardiologists/angiologists experienced in endovascular procedures. An initial list of statements, covering knowledge skills, technical skills and attitudes was created, based on a literature search. Additional statements could be suggested by the experts in the first Delphi round. Each of the statements had to be rated on a 5- point Likert scale. A statement was considered to be a key competency when the internal consistency was greater than alpha = 0.80 and at least 80% of the experts agreed (rating 4/5) or strongly agreed (rating 5/5) with the statement. Questionnaires were emailed to panel members using the Surveymonkey service. Results: Forty-one of 65 (63.1%) invited experts agreed to participate in the study. The response rates were 36 out of 41 (87.8%): overall 38 out of 41(92.6%) in the first round and 36 out of 38 (94.7%) in the second round. The 71 primary statements were supplemented with nine items suggested by the panel. The results showed excellent consensus among responders (Cronbach's alpha = 0.937 first round; 0.958 s round). Experts achieved a consensus that 30 of 33 knowledge skills (90.9%), 23 of 27 technical skills (82.1%), and 15 of 20 attitudes (75.0%) should be considered as key competencies. Conclusions: A multispecialty European endovascular expert panel reached consensus about the key competencies in radiation protection. These results may serve to create practical and relevant radiation protection training courses in the future, enhancing radiation safety for both patients and the entire endovascular team.
KW - Delphi consensus
KW - Education
KW - Endovascular
KW - Multispecialty
KW - Radiation protection
KW - Attitude of Health Personnel
KW - Clinical Competence
KW - Endovascular Procedures/adverse effects
KW - Europe
KW - Humans
KW - Middle Aged
KW - Male
KW - Cardiologists/psychology
KW - Consensus
KW - Radiation Protection
KW - Delphi Technique
KW - X-Rays/adverse effects
KW - Adult
KW - Female
KW - Surveys and Questionnaires
KW - Electronic Mail
KW - Surgeons/psychology
KW - Radiologists/psychology
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85039991416&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.ejvs.2017.11.020
DO - 10.1016/j.ejvs.2017.11.020
M3 - Article
C2 - 29310896
AN - SCOPUS:85039991416
SN - 1078-5884
VL - 55
SP - 281
EP - 287
JO - European Journal of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery
JF - European Journal of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery
IS - 2
ER -