TY - JOUR
T1 - Defining Spine Cancer Pain Syndromes
T2 - A Systematic Review and Proposed Terminology
AU - Pahuta, Markian
AU - Laufer, Ilya
AU - Lo, Sheng fu Larry
AU - Boriani, Stefano
AU - Fisher, Charles
AU - Dea, Nicolas
AU - Weber, Michael H.
AU - Chou, Dean
AU - Sahgal, Arjun
AU - Rhines, Laurence
AU - Reynolds, Jeremy
AU - Lazary, Aron
AU - Gasbarrinni, Alessandro
AU - Verlaan, Jorrit Jan
AU - Gokaslan, Ziya
AU - Bettegowda, Chetan
AU - Sarraj, Mohamed
AU - Barzilai, Ori
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© The Author(s) 2024.
PY - 2025/1
Y1 - 2025/1
N2 - Study Design: Systematic Review. Objectives: Formalized terminology for pain experienced by spine cancer patients is lacking. The common descriptors of spine cancer pain as mechanical or non-mechanical is not exhaustive. Misdiagnosed spinal pain may lead to ineffective treatment recommendations for cancer patients. Methods: We conducted a systematic review of pain terminology that may be relevant to spinal oncology patients. We provide a comprehensive and unbiased summary of the existing evidence, not limited to the spine surgery literature, and subsequently consolidate these data into a practical, clinically relevant nomenclature for spine oncologists. Results: Our literature search identified 3515 unique citations. Through title and abstract screening, 3407 citations were excluded, resulting in 54 full-text citations for review. Pain in cancer patients is typically described as nociceptive pain (somatic vs visceral), neurologic pain and treatment related pain. Conclusions: We consolidate the terminology used in the literature and consolidated into clinically relevant nomenclature of biologic tumor pain, mechanical pain, radicular pain, neuropathic pain, and treatment related pain. This review helps standardize terminology for cancer-related pain which may help clinicians identify pain generators.
AB - Study Design: Systematic Review. Objectives: Formalized terminology for pain experienced by spine cancer patients is lacking. The common descriptors of spine cancer pain as mechanical or non-mechanical is not exhaustive. Misdiagnosed spinal pain may lead to ineffective treatment recommendations for cancer patients. Methods: We conducted a systematic review of pain terminology that may be relevant to spinal oncology patients. We provide a comprehensive and unbiased summary of the existing evidence, not limited to the spine surgery literature, and subsequently consolidate these data into a practical, clinically relevant nomenclature for spine oncologists. Results: Our literature search identified 3515 unique citations. Through title and abstract screening, 3407 citations were excluded, resulting in 54 full-text citations for review. Pain in cancer patients is typically described as nociceptive pain (somatic vs visceral), neurologic pain and treatment related pain. Conclusions: We consolidate the terminology used in the literature and consolidated into clinically relevant nomenclature of biologic tumor pain, mechanical pain, radicular pain, neuropathic pain, and treatment related pain. This review helps standardize terminology for cancer-related pain which may help clinicians identify pain generators.
KW - pain syndrome
KW - spinal metastasis
UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/85215525557
U2 - 10.1177/21925682241259686
DO - 10.1177/21925682241259686
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85215525557
SN - 2192-5682
VL - 15
SP - 81S-92S
JO - Global Spine Journal
JF - Global Spine Journal
IS - 1_suppl
ER -