Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Dedicated First-Trimester Anomaly Scan in a National Prenatal Screening Program and Timing of Diagnosis: The Prospective IMITAS Cohort Study

  • Kim Bronsgeest
  • , Eline E.R. Lust
  • , Lidewij Henneman
  • , Neeltje Crombag
  • , Caterina M. Bilardo
  • , Robert Jan H. Galjaard
  • , Esther Sikkel
  • , Nan van Geloven
  • , Audrey B.C. Coumans
  • , Ayten Elvan-Taşpınar
  • , Sander Galjaard
  • , Attie T.J.I. Go
  • , Elisabeth van Leeuwen
  • , Gwendolyn T.R. Manten
  • , Eva Pajkrt
  • , Mireille N. Bekker
  • , Monique C. Haak*
  • , Eline S. van den Akker
  • , Marcel van Alphen
  • , Jelle H. Baalman
  • Babette A.M. Braams-Lisman, Addy P. Drogtrop, Katja de Graaff, Anjoke J.M. Huisjes, Marloes E. van Huizen, Piet Hummel, Els A.P. de Jong, Ineke Krabbendam, Simone Lunshof, Marinka S. Post, Robbert J.P. Rijnders, Eva Stekkinger, Floortje Vlemmix, Tatjana Vogelvang, Karlijn C. Vollebregt, Sabina de Weerd, Lia Wijnberger, Wim J. van Wijngaarden,
*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

Abstract

Objective: To determine the diagnostic yield of a nationally implemented first-trimester anomaly scan (FTAS), compared to standard obstetric care with a second-trimester anomaly scan. Design: Prospective observational cohort study. Setting: Nationwide prenatal screening program in the Netherlands. Population: Pregnant women referred for suspected fetal anomalies with subsequent abnormal diagnostic scans in 2021–2022. Methods: All fetal diagnoses < 18 weeks' gestational age (GA) were registered: 8 months before (BEFORE) and 1 year after (AFTER) FTAS implementation. BEFORE-cohort: referrals after routine scans (e.g., dating scans). AFTER-cohort: all referrals, including FTAS. Corrections were made for missing referrals < 12 + 3 weeks in the AFTER-cohort. Time adjustment was made in the BEFORE-cohort. Anomalies were categorised as: First-Trimester Major Anomalies (FTMA), often detectable anomalies and other anomalies. Main Outcome Measures: Number of fetal anomalies, time to final diagnosis, GA at termination of pregnancy (TOP). Results: Abnormal diagnostic scans increased from 750 to 1261 (BEFORE vs. AFTER) with definitive diagnoses in 609 vs. 940. Time to diagnosis and GA at TOP in c-BEFORE were comparable to c-AFTER (11 vs. 13 days and GA 14 + 6 vs. 15 + 1, respectively). FTAS increased the detection of often detectable and other anomalies (53 vs. 124 and 248 vs. 474, respectively). FTMA slightly increased (308 vs. 342). Conclusions: FTAS substantially increases detection of fetal anomalies, primarily often detectable and other anomalies. Overall GA at diagnosis or TOP increased marginally, but some cases required an extended period of diagnostic evaluation.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1373-1380
Number of pages8
JournalBJOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology
Volume133
Issue number7
Early online date10 Mar 2026
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Jun 2026

Keywords

  • congenital abnormalities
  • early diagnosis
  • fetal anomaly
  • fetal screening
  • first-trimester
  • first-trimester anomaly scan
  • implementation
  • prenatal diagnosis
  • prenatal screening
  • prenatal ultrasonography

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Dedicated First-Trimester Anomaly Scan in a National Prenatal Screening Program and Timing of Diagnosis: The Prospective IMITAS Cohort Study'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this