De kwaliteit van patiëntenfolders kan beter: een beschouwing aan de hand van radium-223-therapie

Translated title of the contribution: The quality of patient information brochures can be improved: a discussion using radium-223 therapy as an example

Wouter V Vogel, Marnix G E H Lam, Erik Vegt, Leonne Prompers, Mark J Roef

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

Abstract

Patients and their peers need to be adequately informed to ensure proper treatment selection, and to facilitate optimal realisation and outcome of treatment. Written patient information can contribute, but only when brochures are of sufficient quality. An evaluation of patient brochures for radium-223 therapy in the Netherlands revealed significant differences in the information provided, as well as discrepancies between the brochures and national guidelines and product documentation. This potentially leads to confusion, false expectations, wrong treatment decisions, suboptimal realisation and outcome of treatment, and unnecessary toxicity and in radiation hygiene risks. Here we discuss the option of national patient information brochures that can be used by all centres in order to circumvent such issues. This would require collaboration between all medical professions, patient organisations and other groups involved, and responsibilities for medical information, distribution and updates must be properly defined. A national patient information brochure of this kind is currently under development for radium-223 therapy.

Translated title of the contributionThe quality of patient information brochures can be improved: a discussion using radium-223 therapy as an example
Original languageDutch
Pages (from-to)A8948
JournalNederlands Tijdschrift voor Geneeskunde
Volume159
Publication statusPublished - 2015

Cite this