TY - JOUR
T1 - Cross-validation of ultrasound imaging in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis
AU - de Reuver, Steven
AU - Brink, Rob C
AU - Lee, Timothy T Y
AU - Zheng, Yong-Ping
AU - Beek, Frederik J A
AU - Castelein, René M
N1 - Funding Information:
Steven de Reuver: Annafonds – NOREF research grant. Rob Brink: Alexandre Suerman grant UMC Utrecht. Timothy Lee: nothing to declare. Yong-Ping Zheng: Research Grant Council of Hong Kong (PolyU5332/07E, PolyU152220/14E) and the Hong Kong Innovation and Technology Fund (UIM213). Conflict of interest: inventor of a number of patents related to the ultrasound device called Scolioscan, which has been licensed to Telefield Medical Imaging Limited through the Hong Kong Polytechnic University. Also served as consultant for this company for enhancing functions of the system via the university. Frederik Beek: nothing to declare. René Castelein: Stryker Spine Research Grant.
Publisher Copyright:
© 2020, The Author(s).
PY - 2021/3
Y1 - 2021/3
N2 - Purpose: Adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS) patients are exposed to 9–10 times more radiation and a fivefold increased lifetime cancer risk. Radiation-free imaging alternatives are needed. Ultrasound imaging of spinal curvature was shown to be accurate, however, systematically underestimating the Cobb angle. The purpose of this study is to create and cross-validate an equation that calculates the expected Cobb angle using ultrasound spinal measurements of AIS patients. Methods: Seventy AIS patients with upright radiography and spinal ultrasound were split randomly in a 4:1 ratio to the equation creation (n = 54) or validation (n = 16) group. Ultrasound angles based on the spinous processes shadows were measured automatically by the ultrasound system (Scolioscan, Telefield, Hong Kong). For thoracic and lumbar curves separately, the equation: expected Cobb angle = regression coefficient × ultrasound angle, was created and subsequently cross-validated in the validation group. Results: Linear regression analysis between ultrasound angles and radiographic Cobb angles (thoracic: R
2 = 0.968, lumbar: R
2 = 0.923, p < 0.001) in the creation group resulted in the equations: thoracic Cobb angle = 1.43 × ultrasound angle and lumbar Cobb angle = 1.23 × ultrasound angle. With these equations, expected Cobb angles in the validation group were calculated and showed an excellent correlation with the radiographic Cobb angles (thoracic: R
2 = 0.959, lumbar: R
2 = 0.936, p < 0.001). The mean absolute differences were 6.5°–7.3°. Bland–Altman plots showed good accuracy and no proportional bias. Conclusion: The equations from ultrasound measurements to Cobb angles were valid and accurate. This supports the implementation of ultrasound imaging, possibly leading to less frequent radiography and reducing ionizing radiation in AIS patients.
AB - Purpose: Adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS) patients are exposed to 9–10 times more radiation and a fivefold increased lifetime cancer risk. Radiation-free imaging alternatives are needed. Ultrasound imaging of spinal curvature was shown to be accurate, however, systematically underestimating the Cobb angle. The purpose of this study is to create and cross-validate an equation that calculates the expected Cobb angle using ultrasound spinal measurements of AIS patients. Methods: Seventy AIS patients with upright radiography and spinal ultrasound were split randomly in a 4:1 ratio to the equation creation (n = 54) or validation (n = 16) group. Ultrasound angles based on the spinous processes shadows were measured automatically by the ultrasound system (Scolioscan, Telefield, Hong Kong). For thoracic and lumbar curves separately, the equation: expected Cobb angle = regression coefficient × ultrasound angle, was created and subsequently cross-validated in the validation group. Results: Linear regression analysis between ultrasound angles and radiographic Cobb angles (thoracic: R
2 = 0.968, lumbar: R
2 = 0.923, p < 0.001) in the creation group resulted in the equations: thoracic Cobb angle = 1.43 × ultrasound angle and lumbar Cobb angle = 1.23 × ultrasound angle. With these equations, expected Cobb angles in the validation group were calculated and showed an excellent correlation with the radiographic Cobb angles (thoracic: R
2 = 0.959, lumbar: R
2 = 0.936, p < 0.001). The mean absolute differences were 6.5°–7.3°. Bland–Altman plots showed good accuracy and no proportional bias. Conclusion: The equations from ultrasound measurements to Cobb angles were valid and accurate. This supports the implementation of ultrasound imaging, possibly leading to less frequent radiography and reducing ionizing radiation in AIS patients.
KW - Adolescent idiopathic scoliosis
KW - Cobb angle
KW - Radiation-free alternative
KW - Ultrasound imaging
KW - Validation
UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/85095686433
U2 - 10.1007/s00586-020-06652-9
DO - 10.1007/s00586-020-06652-9
M3 - Article
C2 - 33156440
SN - 0940-6719
VL - 30
SP - 628
EP - 633
JO - European spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society
JF - European spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society
IS - 3
ER -