Abstract
Pertussis (whooping cough) is a severe infectious disease in infants less than 6 months old. Mass vaccination programmes have been unable to halt transmission effectively. Strategies to protect new-borns against infection include vaccination of the neonate or the mother directly after birth (cocooning), or the mother during pregnancy (maternal). Here we investigate the cost-effectiveness of these three strategies in the Netherlands. Costs for health care utilization and productivity losses, as well as impact on quality of life were calculated for a 10-year vaccination programme, assuming that vaccine-induced immunity lasts 5 years. Cocooning was the most attractive option from a cost-effectiveness viewpoint (€89,000/QALY). However, both cocooning and maternal vaccination would reduce the disease burden in infants and mothers vaccinated (about 17-20 QALY/year). Specifically, with a persistent epidemic as seen in 2012, there is need for reconsidering the vaccination schedules against pertussis in order to increase protection of the vulnerable new-borns.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 5392-5397 |
| Number of pages | 6 |
| Journal | Vaccine |
| Volume | 31 |
| Issue number | 46 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - 4 Nov 2013 |
| Externally published | Yes |
Keywords
- Adult
- Cost-Benefit Analysis
- Female
- Humans
- Infant
- Infant, Newborn
- Male
- Models, Statistical
- Netherlands/epidemiology
- Pertussis Vaccine/administration & dosage
- Pregnancy
- Vaccination/economics
- Whooping Cough/economics
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Cost-effectiveness of targeted vaccination to protect new-borns against pertussis: comparing neonatal, maternal, and cocooning vaccination strategies'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver