Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Cost-effectiveness analysis of cervical length measurement and fibronectin testing in women with threatened preterm labor

  • Gert-Jan van Baaren*
  • , Jolande Y. Vis
  • , William A. Grobman
  • , Patrick M. Bossuyt
  • , Brent C. Opmeer
  • , Ben W. Mol
  • *Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The objective of the study was to evaluate the cost-effectiveness of risk stratification with cervical length (CL) measurement and/or fetal fibronectin (fFN) tests in women with threatened preterm labor between 24 and 34 weeks' gestation.

STUDY DESIGN: We performed a model-based cost-effectiveness analysis to evaluate 7 test-treatment strategies in women with threatened preterm labor from a health care system perspective. Estimates on disease prevalence, costs, and test accuracy were based on medical literature.

RESULTS: We found that additional fFN testing in the case of a CL between 10 and 30 mm is cost saving without compromising neonatal health outcomes, compared with a treat-all strategy or single CL testing. Implementing this strategy could lead to an annual cost saving between (sic)2.8 million and (sic)14.4 million in The Netherlands, a country with about 180,000 deliveries annually.

CONCLUSION: In women with threatened preterm labor between 24 and 34 weeks of gestation, the most cost-effective test strategy uses a combination of CL and fFN testing.

Original languageEnglish
Article numberARTN 436.e1
Number of pages8
JournalAmerican Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology
Volume209
Issue number5
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Nov 2013

Keywords

  • cervical length
  • cost-effectiveness
  • economic evaluation
  • fibronectin
  • preterm labor
  • RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED-TRIAL
  • FETAL FIBRONECTIN
  • ANTENATAL CORTICOSTEROIDS
  • INTACT MEMBRANES
  • BIRTH
  • NIFEDIPINE
  • RISK
  • PREGNANCIES
  • TOCOLYSIS
  • SINGLETON

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Cost-effectiveness analysis of cervical length measurement and fibronectin testing in women with threatened preterm labor'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this