Corrigendum to ‘Difficult tracheal intubation in neonates and infants. NEonate and Children audiT of Anaesthesia pRactice IN Europe (NECTARINE): a prospective European multicentre observational study' (Br J Anaesth 2021; 126: 1173-81)

, , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

Research output: Contribution to journalComment/Letter to the editorAcademicpeer-review

Abstract

The authors regret that errors were present in the above article. On page 1174, in the second paragraph of the Statistical methods section, the second sentence should read as follows: The incidence of difficult intubation was determined including those whose tracheas were already intubated and is reported as a percentage with a 95% exact binomial CI. On page 1175, in the third paragraph of the Statistical methods section ‘mean standardised difference (MSD)’ should read ‘standardised mean difference (SMD)’ The authors would like to apologise for any inconvenience caused.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)326
Number of pages1
JournalBritish Journal of Anaesthesia
Volume127
Issue number2
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Aug 2021

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Corrigendum to ‘Difficult tracheal intubation in neonates and infants. NEonate and Children audiT of Anaesthesia pRactice IN Europe (NECTARINE): a prospective European multicentre observational study' (Br J Anaesth 2021; 126: 1173-81)'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this