Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Correction to: Acute occupational exposures reported to the Dutch Poisons Information Center: a prospective study on the root causes of incidents at the workplace (Journal of Occupational Medicine and Toxicology, (2022), 17, 1, (19), 10.1186/s12995-022-00360-4)

  • Anja P G Wijnands*
  • , Irma de Vries
  • , Tim Verbruggen
  • , Maxim P Carlier
  • , Dylan W de Lange
  • , Saskia J Rietjens
  • *Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalComment/Letter to the editorAcademicpeer-review

7 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

In the original version of this article [1], inhalation was mentioned as the most common route of occupational exposure (62%), followed by ocular (40%) and dermal contact (33%). Due to a calculation error, the percentage for inhalation was incorrect. The correct percentage is 34%, i.e. in 34% of patients, occupational exposure occurred via inhalation. Because of this error, the text of the abstract, results (exposure characteristics) and discussion, should be amended as follows: Abstract: Patients were often exposed via multiple routes (ocular contact 40%, inhalation 34% and dermal contact 33%). Results: Patients were often exposed via multiple routes, most commonly involving ocular contact (40.0%), followed by inhalation (33.9%), dermal contact (32.6%) and oral exposures (9.4%). Discussion: Patients were often exposed via multiple routes (ocular contact 40%, inhalation 34% and dermal contact 33%). A comparable exposure pattern was found in a previous Poison Control Center (PCC) study [7]. The original article has been corrected.

Original languageEnglish
Article number5
Number of pages1
JournalJournal of occupational medicine and toxicology
Volume19
Issue number1
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 14 Feb 2024

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Correction to: Acute occupational exposures reported to the Dutch Poisons Information Center: a prospective study on the root causes of incidents at the workplace (Journal of Occupational Medicine and Toxicology, (2022), 17, 1, (19), 10.1186/s12995-022-00360-4)'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this