Abstract
This preliminary retrospective study evaluates the diagnostic value of cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT), as a potential standard preoperative procedure, in assessing mandibular invasion by oral squamous cell carcinoma (OSCC) compared with conventional preoperative panoramic radiography (PR), magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and histological examination of the resection specimen (the golden standard). Between September 2006 and September 2009, 23 patients with histology proven primary OSCC, adjacent to or fixed to the mandible were included. The tumours were classified into four groups, ranging from no bone invasion to evident bone invasion. Sensitivity and specificity for PR were 55% (95% CI [0.350;0.619]) and 92% (95% CI 0.737;0.984]), respectively, both were significantly lower than the 91% (95% CI [0.740;0.909]) and 100% (95% CI [0.845;1]), respectively, for CBCT. MRI showed 82% sensitivity (95% CI [0.608;0.941]) and 67% specificity (95% CI [0.474;0.779]). CBCT has the potential to become a new diagnostic tool in the OSCC screening procedure to predict mandibular invasion or erosion, but its value may be limited by its relatively low sensitivity. A prospective study will start on 64 patients (alpha=0.05; power 0.8; effect size 0.5) to improve these results statistically.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | 436-439 |
Number of pages | 4 |
Journal | International Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery |
Volume | 39 |
Issue number | 5 |
DOIs | |
Publication status | Published - 2010 |
Keywords
- Adult
- Aged
- Aged, 80 and over
- Carcinoma, Squamous Cell
- Cone-Beam Computed Tomography
- Humans
- Magnetic Resonance Imaging
- Mandibular Neoplasms
- Middle Aged
- Neoplasm Invasiveness
- Pilot Projects
- Radiography, Panoramic
- Retrospective Studies
- Sensitivity and Specificity