Concurrent Validity Between Live and Home Video Observations Using the Alberta Infant Motor Scale

Marike Boonzaaijer, Ellen van Dam, Ingrid C van Haastert, Jacqueline Nuysink

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

3 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

PURPOSE: Serial assessment of gross motor development of infants at risk is an established procedure in neonatal follow-up clinics. Assessments based on home video recordings could be a relevant addition.

METHODS: In 48 infants (1.5-19 months), the concurrent validity of 2 applications was examined using the Alberta Infant Motor Scale: (1) a home video made by parents and (2) simultaneous observation on-site by a pediatric physical therapist. Parents' experiences were explored using a questionnaire.

RESULTS: The intraclass correlation coefficient agreement between live and home video assessment was 0.99, with a standard error of measurement of 1.41 items. Intra- and interrater reliability: intraclass correlation coefficients were more than 0.99. According to 94% of the parents, recording their infant's movement repertoire was easy to perform.

CONCLUSION: Assessing the Alberta Infant Motor Scale based on home video recordings is comparable to assessment by live observation. The video method is a promising application that can be used with low burden for parents and infants.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)146-151
Number of pages6
JournalPediatric Physical Therapy
Volume29
Issue number2
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Apr 2017

Keywords

  • Gross motor development
  • Home video recording
  • Infant
  • Motor assessment
  • Validation study

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Concurrent Validity Between Live and Home Video Observations Using the Alberta Infant Motor Scale'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this