Concurrent de novo ZFHX4 variant and 16q24.1 deletion in a patient with orofacial clefting; a potential role of ZFHX4 and USP10

Marijn Créton*, Frank Wagener, Maarten Massink, Willem Fennis, Marjon Bloemen, Jan Schols, Miranda Aarts, Aebele Mink van der Molen, Gijs van Haaften, Marie José van den Boogaard

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

33 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

A girl with a unilateral cleft lip, alveolus and palate, tooth agenesis, and mild dysmorphic features, without a specific underlying syndrome diagnosis, was genotypically characterized and phenotypically described. Cleft gene panel analysis, single-nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) array, whole genome sequencing (WGS), whole exome sequencing, and quantitative PCR (Q-PCR) analysis were used as diagnostic tests. SNP array revealed a maternal deletion at 16q24.1, encompassing the cleft candidate gene USP10. WES revealed an additional de novo Loss-of-Function variant (p.(Asn838fs)) in the Zinc-Finger-Homeobox-4 (ZFHX4) gene. Q-PCR was performed to explore the effect of the ZFHX4 variant and the deletion in 16q24.1. The mRNA expression of a selection of putative target genes involved in orofacial clefting showed a lowered expression of USP10 (52%), CRISPLD2 (31%), and CRISPLD1 (1%) compared to the control. IRF6 showed no difference in gene expression. This case supports ZFHX4 as a novel cleft gene and suggests USP10 may contribute to the etiology of orofacial clefts in humans.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1083-1088
Number of pages6
JournalAmerican Journal of Medical Genetics, Part A
Volume191
Issue number4
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Apr 2023

Keywords

  • cleft palate
  • CRISPLD1
  • CRISPLD2
  • IRF6
  • USP10
  • ZFHX4

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Concurrent de novo ZFHX4 variant and 16q24.1 deletion in a patient with orofacial clefting; a potential role of ZFHX4 and USP10'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this