Con: Routine shunting is not the optimal management of the patient undergoing carotid endarterectomy, but neither is neuromonitoring.

C.J. Kalkman

Con: Routine shunting is not the optimal management of the patient undergoing carotid endarterectomy, but neither is neuromonitoring.

Translated title of the contribution: Con: Routine shunting is not the optimal management of the patient undergoing carotid endarterectomy, but neither is neuromonitoring.

C.J. Kalkman

Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › Academic › peer-review

Translated title of the contribution	Con: Routine shunting is not the optimal management of the patient undergoing carotid endarterectomy, but neither is neuromonitoring.
Original language	Undefined/Unknown
Pages (from-to)	381-383
Number of pages	3
Journal	Journal of Cardiothoracic Vascular Anesthesia
Volume	18
Issue number	3
Publication status	Published - 2004

Cite this

@article{027c4382e3a2446ba8569fb777136461,

title = "Con: Routine shunting is not the optimal management of the patient undergoing carotid endarterectomy, but neither is neuromonitoring.",

author = "C.J. Kalkman",

year = "2004",

language = "Undefined/Unknown",

volume = "18",

pages = "381--383",

journal = "Journal of Cardiothoracic Vascular Anesthesia",

issn = "1053-0770",

publisher = "W.B. Saunders",

number = "3",

}