Abstract
RNA-seq is increasingly used for quantitative profiling of small RNAs (for example, microRNAs, piRNAs and snoRNAs) in diverse sample types, including isolated cells, tissues and cell-free biofluids. The accuracy and reproducibility of the currently used small RNA-seq library preparation methods have not been systematically tested. Here we report results obtained by a consortium of nine labs that independently sequenced reference, 'ground truth' samples of synthetic small RNAs and human plasma-derived RNA. We assessed three commercially available library preparation methods that use adapters of defined sequence and six methods using adapters with degenerate bases. Both protocol- and sequence-specific biases were identified, including biases that reduced the ability of small RNA-seq to accurately measure adenosine-to-inosine editing in microRNAs. We found that these biases were mitigated by library preparation methods that incorporate adapters with degenerate bases. MicroRNA relative quantification between samples using small RNA-seq was accurate and reproducible across laboratories and methods.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 746-757 |
| Number of pages | 12 |
| Journal | Nature Biotechnology |
| Volume | 36 |
| Issue number | 8 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - Sept 2018 |
| Externally published | Yes |
Keywords
- Adenosine/genetics
- Humans
- Inosine/genetics
- MicroRNAs/blood
- RNA Editing
- Reference Standards
- Reproducibility of Results
- Sequence Analysis, RNA/methods
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Comprehensive multi-center assessment of small RNA-seq methods for quantitative miRNA profiling'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver