Abstract
Objective
A normal penile cosmesis is an important goal in distal hypospadias repair. Depending on cultural standards, repairs are combined with a preputioplasty or circumcision to attain a ‘normal’ penile appearance. Although short-term complication rates of preputioplasty are available, data on long-term outcomes are scarce. Therefore, this study assessed long-term functional and cosmetic outcomes of distal hypospadias repair with either a preputioplasty or a circumcision.
Patients and methods
Eligible for inclusion were patients with distal hypospadias operated in childhood between 1987 and 1993. Complications and reasons for secondary circumcision were extracted from the medical charts. Participants completed a questionnaire including the International Index of Erectile Function (IIEF-15), the International Prostate Symptom score (IPSS), and additional non-validated questions. Penile cosmesis was judged with the Penile Perception Score (PPS), stretched penile length was measured, and uroflowmetry was performed.
Results
Of the 86 eligible and traceable patients, 40 (47%) participated; of them, 27 had a preputioplasty and 13 a circumcision. Six patients underwent a secondary circumcision due to a preputial defect (n = 2), unsatisfactory cosmetic result (n = 2), religious reason (n = 1), or phimosis (n = 1). Complication rates were similar in both the groups. Long-term outcomes in the preputioplasty and circumcision group were comparable regarding cosmetic, sexual, and micturition outcomes.
Conclusions
Distal hypospadias correction combined with preputioplasty had complication rates similar to those of hypospadias repair with circumcision. In these patients, preputioplasty had a failure rate of 22%. In both the groups, long-term outcomes of urinary function, sexual function, and cosmesis were good.
A normal penile cosmesis is an important goal in distal hypospadias repair. Depending on cultural standards, repairs are combined with a preputioplasty or circumcision to attain a ‘normal’ penile appearance. Although short-term complication rates of preputioplasty are available, data on long-term outcomes are scarce. Therefore, this study assessed long-term functional and cosmetic outcomes of distal hypospadias repair with either a preputioplasty or a circumcision.
Patients and methods
Eligible for inclusion were patients with distal hypospadias operated in childhood between 1987 and 1993. Complications and reasons for secondary circumcision were extracted from the medical charts. Participants completed a questionnaire including the International Index of Erectile Function (IIEF-15), the International Prostate Symptom score (IPSS), and additional non-validated questions. Penile cosmesis was judged with the Penile Perception Score (PPS), stretched penile length was measured, and uroflowmetry was performed.
Results
Of the 86 eligible and traceable patients, 40 (47%) participated; of them, 27 had a preputioplasty and 13 a circumcision. Six patients underwent a secondary circumcision due to a preputial defect (n = 2), unsatisfactory cosmetic result (n = 2), religious reason (n = 1), or phimosis (n = 1). Complication rates were similar in both the groups. Long-term outcomes in the preputioplasty and circumcision group were comparable regarding cosmetic, sexual, and micturition outcomes.
Conclusions
Distal hypospadias correction combined with preputioplasty had complication rates similar to those of hypospadias repair with circumcision. In these patients, preputioplasty had a failure rate of 22%. In both the groups, long-term outcomes of urinary function, sexual function, and cosmesis were good.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 47.e1-47.e9 |
| Journal | Journal of Pediatric Urology |
| Volume | 15 |
| Issue number | 1 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - Feb 2019 |
Keywords
- Foreskin
- Hypospadias
- Male circumcision
- Preputioplasty
- Treatment outcome
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Comparison of preputioplasty and circumcision in distal hypospadias correction: long-term follow-up'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver