Comparing the performance of FAM19A4 methylation analysis, cytology and HPV16/18 genotyping for the detection of cervical (pre) cancer in high-risk HPV-positive women of a gynecologic outpatient population (COMETH-study)

R. Luttmer, L.M. de Strooper, J. Berkhof, P.J. Snijders, M.G. Dijkstra, M. Uijterwaal, R.D. Steenbergen, F.J. van Kemenade, L. Rozendaal, T.J.M. Helmerhorst, RHM Verheijen, W.A. ter Harmsel, W.M. van Baal, G.C.M. Graziosi, W.G. Quint, D.A. Heideman, Chris J. L. M. Meijer

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

Abstract

Recently, DNA methylation analysis of FAM19A4 in cervical scrapes has been shown to adequately detect high-grade cervical intraepithelial neoplasia and cervical cancer (≥CIN3) in high-risk HPV (hrHPV)-positive women. Here, we compared the clinical performance of FAM19A4 methylation analysis to cytology and HPV16/18 genotyping, separately and in combination, for ≥CIN3 detection in hrHPV-positive women participating in a prospective observational multi-center cohort study. The study population comprised hrHPV-positive women aged 18–66 years, visiting a gynecological outpatient clinic. From these women, cervical scrapes and colposcopy-directed biopsies (for histological confirmation) were obtained. Cervical scrapes were analyzed for FAM19A4 gene promoter methylation, cytology and HPV16/18 genotyping. Methylation analysis was performed by quantitative methylation-specific PCR (qMSP). Sensitivities and specificities for ≥CIN3 were compared between tests. Stratified analyses were performed for variables that potentially influence marker performance. Of all 508 hrHPV-positive women, the sensitivities for ≥CIN3 of cytology, FAM19A4 methylation analysis, and cytology combined with HPV16/18 genotyping were 85.6, 75.6 and 92.2%, respectively, with corresponding specificities of 49.8, 71.1 and 29.4%, respectively. Both sensitivity and specificity of FAM19A4 methylation analysis were associated with age (p ≤ 0.001 each). In women ≥30 years (n = 287), ≥CIN3 sensitivity of FAM19A4 methylation analysis was 88.3% (95%CI: 80.2–96.5) which was noninferior to that of cytology [85.5% (95%CI: 76.0–94.0)], at a significantly higher specificity [62.1% (95%CI: 55.8–68.4) compared to 47.6% (95%CI: 41.1–54.1)]. In conclusion, among hrHPV-positive women from an outpatient population aged ≥30 years, methylation analysis of FAM19A4 is an attractive marker for the identification of women with ≥CIN3.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)992-1002
JournalInternational Journal of Cancer
Volume138
Issue number4
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 15 Feb 2016

Keywords

  • DNA methylation
  • cervical intraepithelial neoplasia
  • cervical cancer
  • cervical scrapes
  • human papillomavirus
  • qMSP

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Comparing the performance of FAM19A4 methylation analysis, cytology and HPV16/18 genotyping for the detection of cervical (pre) cancer in high-risk HPV-positive women of a gynecologic outpatient population (COMETH-study)'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this