Comparing the impact of two concurrent infectious disease outbreaks on the Netherlands population, 2009, using disability-adjusted life years

R. J. Brooke*, A. Van Lier, G. A. Donker, W. Van Der Hoek, M. E.E. Kretzschmar

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

8 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

In 2009 two notable outbreaks, Q fever and the novel influenza A(H1N1)pdm09, occurred in The Netherlands. Using a composite health measure, disability-adjusted life years (DALYs), the outbreaks were quantified and compared. DALYs were calculated using standardized methodology incorporating age- and sex-stratified data in a disease progression model; years lost due to disability and years of life lost were computed by outcome. Nationally, influenza A(H1N1)pdm09 caused more DALYs (24 484) than Q fever (5797). However, Q fever was 8·28 times more severe [497 DALYs/1000 symptomatic cases (DP1SC)] than A(H1N1)pdm09 (60 DP1SC). The A(H1N1)pdm09 burden is largely due to mortality while the Q fever burden is due primarily to long-term sequelae. Intervention prioritization for influenza should support patients in a critical condition while for Q fever it should target immediate containment and support for patients with long-term sequelae. Burden estimates provide guidance for focusing intervention options during outbreaks of infectious diseases.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)2412-2421
Number of pages10
JournalEpidemiology and Infection
Volume142
Issue number11
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Jan 2014

Keywords

  • Epidemics
  • influenza A
  • mathematical modelling
  • pandemic
  • Q fever

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Comparing the impact of two concurrent infectious disease outbreaks on the Netherlands population, 2009, using disability-adjusted life years'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this