Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Comparative Clinical and Imaging-Based Evaluation of Therapeutic Modalities in CNS Embryonal Tumours With PLAGL Amplification

  • Michaela Kristina Keck
  • , Anna Tietze
  • , Brigitte Bison
  • , Shivaram Avula
  • , Julien Engelhardt
  • , Cécile Faure-Conter
  • , Tanguy Fenouil
  • , Dominique Figarella-Branger
  • , Einar Goebell
  • , Johannes Gojo
  • , Christine Haberler
  • , Juhana Hakumäki
  • , James T Hayden
  • , Laura S Korhonen
  • , Ewa Koscielniak
  • , Christof M Kramm
  • , Mariëtte E  G Kranendonk
  • , Maarten Lequin
  • , Louise E Ludlow
  • , David Meyronet
  • Per Nyman, Ingrid Øra, Thomas Perwein, Jouni Pesola, Tuomas Rauramaa, Roel Reddingius, David Samuel, Antoinette Y  N Schouten-van Meeteren, Alexandra Sexton-Oates, Alexandre Vasiljevic, Thekla von Kalle, Annika K Wefers, Pieter Wesseling, Josef Zamecnik, Michal Zapotocky, Katja von Hoff*, David T  W Jones*
*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

2 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

Aims: Embryonal tumours with PLAGL1 or PLAGL2 amplification (ET, PLAGL) show substantial heterogeneity regarding their clinical characteristics and have been treated inconsistently, resulting in diverse outcomes. In this study, we aimed to evaluate the clinical behaviour of ET, PLAGL and elucidate their response pattern across the different applied treatment regimens. Methods: We conducted an in-depth retrospective analysis of clinical and serial imaging data of 18 patients with ET, PLAGL (nine each of PLAGL1 and PLAGL2 amplified). Results: Patients with PLAGL1-amplified tumours (ET, PLAGL1) had fewer relapses (3/9), while PLAGL2-amplified tumours (ET, PLAGL2) were prone to early relapse or progression (8/9) and to distant, leptomeningeal and intraventricular relapses. Progression-free survival differed significantly between the subtypes (log-rank test, p = 0.0055). Postoperative treatment included chemotherapy (n = 17, various protocols), alone (n = 8) or combined with radiotherapy (n = 9). Responses to chemotherapy were observed in both subtypes, and incomplete resection was not associated with inferior survival. All three survivors with ET, PLAGL2 were treated with induction and high-dose chemotherapy with (n = 1—low-dose CSI and boost) or without (n = 2) radiotherapy, whereas five patients with less intensive chemotherapy relapsed. All six survivors with ET, PLAGL1 were treated with conventional chemotherapy regimens, with (n = 4—local radiotherapy n = 3; CSI and boost n = 1) or without (n = 2) radiotherapy. Two patients with ET, PLAGL1 relapsed after 8 years. Conclusions: Adjuvant therapy should be considered for all ET, PLAGL patients: Patients with ET, PLAGL2 might benefit from intensified chemotherapy regimens. In contrast, patients with ET, PLAGL1 showed superior outcomes without high-dose chemotherapy or craniospinal irradiation.

Original languageEnglish
Article numbere70015
Number of pages11
JournalNeuropathology and Applied Neurobiology
Volume51
Issue number2
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Apr 2025

Keywords

  • embryonal CNS tumour
  • ET, PLAGL
  • PLAGL1
  • PLAGL2
  • treatment

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Comparative Clinical and Imaging-Based Evaluation of Therapeutic Modalities in CNS Embryonal Tumours With PLAGL Amplification'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this