TY - JOUR
T1 - Comparative Clinical and Imaging-Based Evaluation of Therapeutic Modalities in CNS Embryonal Tumours With PLAGL Amplification
AU - Keck, Michaela Kristina
AU - Tietze, Anna
AU - Bison, Brigitte
AU - Avula, Shivaram
AU - Engelhardt, Julien
AU - Faure-Conter, Cécile
AU - Fenouil, Tanguy
AU - Figarella-Branger, Dominique
AU - Goebell, Einar
AU - Gojo, Johannes
AU - Haberler, Christine
AU - Hakumäki, Juhana
AU - Hayden, James T
AU - Korhonen, Laura S
AU - Koscielniak, Ewa
AU - Kramm, Christof M
AU - Kranendonk, Mariëtte E G
AU - Lequin, Maarten
AU - Ludlow, Louise E
AU - Meyronet, David
AU - Nyman, Per
AU - Øra, Ingrid
AU - Perwein, Thomas
AU - Pesola, Jouni
AU - Rauramaa, Tuomas
AU - Reddingius, Roel
AU - Samuel, David
AU - Schouten-van Meeteren, Antoinette Y N
AU - Sexton-Oates, Alexandra
AU - Vasiljevic, Alexandre
AU - von Kalle, Thekla
AU - Wefers, Annika K
AU - Wesseling, Pieter
AU - Zamecnik, Josef
AU - Zapotocky, Michal
AU - von Hoff, Katja
AU - Jones, David T W
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2025 The Author(s). Neuropathology and Applied Neurobiology published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of British Neuropathological Society.
PY - 2025/4
Y1 - 2025/4
N2 - Aims: Embryonal tumours with PLAGL1 or PLAGL2 amplification (ET, PLAGL) show substantial heterogeneity regarding their clinical characteristics and have been treated inconsistently, resulting in diverse outcomes. In this study, we aimed to evaluate the clinical behaviour of ET, PLAGL and elucidate their response pattern across the different applied treatment regimens. Methods: We conducted an in-depth retrospective analysis of clinical and serial imaging data of 18 patients with ET, PLAGL (nine each of PLAGL1 and PLAGL2 amplified). Results: Patients with PLAGL1-amplified tumours (ET, PLAGL1) had fewer relapses (3/9), while PLAGL2-amplified tumours (ET, PLAGL2) were prone to early relapse or progression (8/9) and to distant, leptomeningeal and intraventricular relapses. Progression-free survival differed significantly between the subtypes (log-rank test, p = 0.0055). Postoperative treatment included chemotherapy (n = 17, various protocols), alone (n = 8) or combined with radiotherapy (n = 9). Responses to chemotherapy were observed in both subtypes, and incomplete resection was not associated with inferior survival. All three survivors with ET, PLAGL2 were treated with induction and high-dose chemotherapy with (n = 1—low-dose CSI and boost) or without (n = 2) radiotherapy, whereas five patients with less intensive chemotherapy relapsed. All six survivors with ET, PLAGL1 were treated with conventional chemotherapy regimens, with (n = 4—local radiotherapy n = 3; CSI and boost n = 1) or without (n = 2) radiotherapy. Two patients with ET, PLAGL1 relapsed after 8 years. Conclusions: Adjuvant therapy should be considered for all ET, PLAGL patients: Patients with ET, PLAGL2 might benefit from intensified chemotherapy regimens. In contrast, patients with ET, PLAGL1 showed superior outcomes without high-dose chemotherapy or craniospinal irradiation.
AB - Aims: Embryonal tumours with PLAGL1 or PLAGL2 amplification (ET, PLAGL) show substantial heterogeneity regarding their clinical characteristics and have been treated inconsistently, resulting in diverse outcomes. In this study, we aimed to evaluate the clinical behaviour of ET, PLAGL and elucidate their response pattern across the different applied treatment regimens. Methods: We conducted an in-depth retrospective analysis of clinical and serial imaging data of 18 patients with ET, PLAGL (nine each of PLAGL1 and PLAGL2 amplified). Results: Patients with PLAGL1-amplified tumours (ET, PLAGL1) had fewer relapses (3/9), while PLAGL2-amplified tumours (ET, PLAGL2) were prone to early relapse or progression (8/9) and to distant, leptomeningeal and intraventricular relapses. Progression-free survival differed significantly between the subtypes (log-rank test, p = 0.0055). Postoperative treatment included chemotherapy (n = 17, various protocols), alone (n = 8) or combined with radiotherapy (n = 9). Responses to chemotherapy were observed in both subtypes, and incomplete resection was not associated with inferior survival. All three survivors with ET, PLAGL2 were treated with induction and high-dose chemotherapy with (n = 1—low-dose CSI and boost) or without (n = 2) radiotherapy, whereas five patients with less intensive chemotherapy relapsed. All six survivors with ET, PLAGL1 were treated with conventional chemotherapy regimens, with (n = 4—local radiotherapy n = 3; CSI and boost n = 1) or without (n = 2) radiotherapy. Two patients with ET, PLAGL1 relapsed after 8 years. Conclusions: Adjuvant therapy should be considered for all ET, PLAGL patients: Patients with ET, PLAGL2 might benefit from intensified chemotherapy regimens. In contrast, patients with ET, PLAGL1 showed superior outcomes without high-dose chemotherapy or craniospinal irradiation.
KW - embryonal CNS tumour
KW - ET, PLAGL
KW - PLAGL1
KW - PLAGL2
KW - treatment
UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/105002147888
U2 - 10.1111/nan.70015
DO - 10.1111/nan.70015
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:105002147888
SN - 0305-1846
VL - 51
JO - Neuropathology and Applied Neurobiology
JF - Neuropathology and Applied Neurobiology
IS - 2
M1 - e70015
ER -