TY - JOUR
T1 - Comorbidities and cause-specific outcomes in heart failure across the ejection fraction spectrum
T2 - A blueprint for clinical trial design
AU - Savarese, Gianluigi
AU - Settergren, Camilla
AU - Schrage, Benedikt
AU - Thorvaldsen, Tonje
AU - Löfman, Ida
AU - Sartipy, Ulrik
AU - Mellbin, Linda
AU - Meyers, Andrea
AU - Farsani, Soulmaz Fazeli
AU - Brueckmann, Martina
AU - Brodovicz, Kimberly G
AU - Vedin, Ola
AU - Asselbergs, Folkert W
AU - Dahlström, Ulf
AU - Cosentino, Francesco
AU - Lund, Lars H
N1 - Funding Information:
LHL reports grants and personal fees from Boehringer Ingelheim, during the conduct of the study; personal fees from Merck, personal fees from Sanofi, grants and personal fees from Vifor-Fresenius, grants and personal fees from AstraZeneca, grants and personal fees from Relypsa, personal fees from Bayer, grants from Boston Scientific, grants and personal fees from Novartis, personal fees from Pharmacosmos, personal fees from Abbott, grants and personal fees from Mundipharma, personal fees from Medscape, outside the submitted work.
Funding Information:
This study received support from Boehringer Ingelheim and the EU/EFPIA Innovative Medicines Initiative 2 Joint Undertaking BigData@Heart grant (no. 116074 ).
Funding Information:
GS reports grants and personal fees from Vifor, non-financial support from Boehringer Ingelheim, personal fees from Societa´ Prodotti Antibiotici, grants from MSD, grants and personal fees from AstraZeneca, personal fees from Roche, personal fees from Servier, grants from Novartis, personal fees from GENESIS, personal fees from Medtronic, personal fees from Cytokinetics, outside the submitted work.
Publisher Copyright:
© 2020 Elsevier B.V.
Copyright:
Copyright 2020 Elsevier B.V., All rights reserved.
PY - 2020/8/15
Y1 - 2020/8/15
N2 - BACKGROUND: Comorbidities may differently affect treatment response and cause-specific outcomes in heart failure (HF) with preserved (HFpEF) vs. mid-range/mildly-reduced (HFmrEF) vs. reduced (HFrEF) ejection fraction (EF), complicating trial design. In patients with HF, we performed a comprehensive analysis of type 2 diabetes (T2DM), atrial fibrillation (AF) chronic kidney disease (CKD), and cause-specific outcomes.METHODS AND RESULTS: Of 42,583 patients from the Swedish HF registry (23% HFpEF, 21% HFmrEF, 56% HFrEF), 24% had T2DM, 51% CKD, 56% AF, and 8% all three comorbidities. HFpEF had higher prevalence of CKD and AF, HFmrEF had intermediate prevalence of AF, and prevalence of T2DM was similar across the EF spectrum. Patients with T2DM, AF and/or CKD were more likely to have also other comorbidities and more severe HF. Risk of cardiovascular (CV) events was highest in HFrEF vs. HFpEF and HFmrEF; non-CV risk was highest in HFpEF vs. HFmrEF vs. HFrEF. T2DM increased CV and non-CV events similarly but less so in HFpEF. CKD increased CV events somewhat more than non-CV events and less so in HFpEF. AF increased CV events considerably more than non-CV events and more so in HFpEF and HFmrEF.CONCLUSION: HFpEF is distinguished from HFmrEF and HFrEF by more comorbidities, non-CV events, but lower effect of T2DM and CKD on events. CV events are most frequent in HFrEF. To enrich for CV vs. non-CV events, trialists should not exclude patients with lower EF, AF and/or CKD, who report higher CV risk.
AB - BACKGROUND: Comorbidities may differently affect treatment response and cause-specific outcomes in heart failure (HF) with preserved (HFpEF) vs. mid-range/mildly-reduced (HFmrEF) vs. reduced (HFrEF) ejection fraction (EF), complicating trial design. In patients with HF, we performed a comprehensive analysis of type 2 diabetes (T2DM), atrial fibrillation (AF) chronic kidney disease (CKD), and cause-specific outcomes.METHODS AND RESULTS: Of 42,583 patients from the Swedish HF registry (23% HFpEF, 21% HFmrEF, 56% HFrEF), 24% had T2DM, 51% CKD, 56% AF, and 8% all three comorbidities. HFpEF had higher prevalence of CKD and AF, HFmrEF had intermediate prevalence of AF, and prevalence of T2DM was similar across the EF spectrum. Patients with T2DM, AF and/or CKD were more likely to have also other comorbidities and more severe HF. Risk of cardiovascular (CV) events was highest in HFrEF vs. HFpEF and HFmrEF; non-CV risk was highest in HFpEF vs. HFmrEF vs. HFrEF. T2DM increased CV and non-CV events similarly but less so in HFpEF. CKD increased CV events somewhat more than non-CV events and less so in HFpEF. AF increased CV events considerably more than non-CV events and more so in HFpEF and HFmrEF.CONCLUSION: HFpEF is distinguished from HFmrEF and HFrEF by more comorbidities, non-CV events, but lower effect of T2DM and CKD on events. CV events are most frequent in HFrEF. To enrich for CV vs. non-CV events, trialists should not exclude patients with lower EF, AF and/or CKD, who report higher CV risk.
KW - Atrial fibrillation
KW - Chronic kidney disease
KW - Ejection fraction
KW - Heart failure
KW - Trial design
KW - Type 2 diabetes mellitus
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85084408767&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.ijcard.2020.04.068
DO - 10.1016/j.ijcard.2020.04.068
M3 - Article
C2 - 32360702
SN - 0167-5273
VL - 313
SP - 76
EP - 82
JO - International Journal of Cardiology
JF - International Journal of Cardiology
ER -