Code status documentation at admission in COVID-19 patients: A descriptive cohort study

Saskia Briedé*, Harriet M.R. Van Goor, Titus A.P. De Hond, Sonja E. Van Roeden, Judith M. Staats, Jan Jelrik Oosterheert, Frederiek Van Den Bos, Karin A.H. Kaasjager

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

6 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

Objectives The COVID-19 pandemic pressurised healthcare with increased shortage of care. This resulted in an increase of awareness for code status documentation (ie, whether limitations to specific life-sustaining treatments are in place), both in the medical field and in public media. However, it is unknown whether the increased awareness changed the prevalence and content of code status documentation for COVID-19 patients. We aim to describe differences in code status documentation between infectious patients before the pandemic and COVID-19 patients. Setting University Medical Centre of Utrecht, a tertiary care teaching academic hospital in the Netherlands. Participants A total of 1715 patients were included, 129 in the COVID-19 cohort (a cohort of COVID-19 patients, admitted from March 2020 to June 2020) and 1586 in the pre-COVID-19 cohort (a cohort of patients with (suspected) infections admitted between September 2016 to September 2018). Primary and secondary outcome measures We described frequency of code status documentation, frequency of discussion of this code status with patient and/or family, and content of code status. Results Frequencies of code status documentation (69.8% vs 72.7%, respectively) and discussion (75.6% vs 73.3%, respectively) were similar in both cohorts. More patients in the COVID-19 cohort than in the before COVID-19 cohort had any treatment limitation as opposed to full code (40% vs 25%). Within the treatment limitations, no intensive care admission' (81% vs 51%) and no intubation' (69% vs 40%) were more frequently documented in the COVID-19 cohort. A smaller difference was seen in other limitation' (17% vs 9%), while no resuscitation' (96% vs 92%) was comparable between both periods. Conclusion We observed no difference in the frequency of code status documentation or discussion in COVID-19 patients opposed to a pre-COVID-19 cohort. However, treatment limitations were more prevalent in patients with COVID-19, especially no intubation' and no intensive care admission'.

Original languageEnglish
Article numbere050268
JournalBMJ Open
Volume11
Issue number11
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 10 Nov 2021

Keywords

  • adult intensive & critical care
  • COVID-19
  • internal medicine
  • SARS-CoV-2
  • Pandemics
  • Humans
  • Documentation
  • Cohort Studies

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Code status documentation at admission in COVID-19 patients: A descriptive cohort study'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this