Clinically relevant potential drug-drug interactions in intensive care patients: A large retrospective observational multicenter study

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

3 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

PURPOSE: Potential drug-drug interactions (pDDIs) may harm patients admitted to the Intensive Care Unit (ICU). Due to the patient's critical condition and continuous monitoring on the ICU, not all pDDIs are clinically relevant. Clinical decision support systems (CDSSs) warning for irrelevant pDDIs could result in alert fatigue and overlooking important signals. Therefore, our aim was to describe the frequency of clinically relevant pDDIs (crpDDIs) to enable tailoring of CDSSs to the ICU setting. MATERIALS & METHODS: In this multicenter retrospective observational study, we used medication administration data to identify pDDIs in ICU admissions from 13 ICUs. Clinical relevance was based on a Delphi study in which intensivists and hospital pharmacists assessed the clinical relevance of pDDIs for the ICU setting. RESULTS: The mean number of pDDIs per 1000 medication administrations was 70.1, dropping to 31.0 when considering only crpDDIs. Of 103,871 ICU patients, 38% was exposed to a crpDDI. The most frequently occurring crpDDIs involve QT-prolonging agents, digoxin, or NSAIDs. CONCLUSIONS: Considering clinical relevance of pDDIs in the ICU setting is important, as only half of the detected pDDIs were crpDDIs. Therefore, tailoring CDSSs to the ICU may reduce alert fatigue and improve medication safety in ICU patients.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)124-130
Number of pages7
JournalJournal of Critical Care
Volume62
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Apr 2021

Keywords

  • Clinical decision support
  • Drug-drug interactions
  • Intensive care
  • Medication safety
  • Patient safety
  • Pharmacoepidemiology

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Clinically relevant potential drug-drug interactions in intensive care patients: A large retrospective observational multicenter study'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this