Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Clinical Recommendations for Remote Robotic Assisted Surgery From the CRSA 2025 International Consensus Conference

  • Yuman Fong*
  • , Dimitri A. Raptis
  • , Louis Kavoussi
  • , Sherry M. Wren
  • , Dennis Fowler
  • , Mehran Anvari
  • , Francesco Bianco
  • , Xiao Liang
  • , Zheyong Li
  • , Xiaoyu Yin
  • , Micaela Piccoli
  • , Saad Aldousari
  • , John Marks
  • , Baiyong Shen
  • , Clifford Ko
  • , Jelle Ruurda
  • , Barbara Seeliger
  • , Jeroen Hagendoorn
  • , Rahila Essani
  • , R. Matthew Walsh
  • Dmitry Oleynikov, Stephanie B. Jones, Vivek Bindal, Hyun Koo Kim, Woo Jin Hyung, Laleh Melstrom, Daniel Hashimoto, Francesco Celotto, Liaohai Leo Chen, Bryan M. Burt, Kelly Lafaro, Fernando Elli, Yusef Kudsi, Francesca Ratti, Erik Wilson, Paolo Pietro Bianchi, Annette Morgan, Stephen T. Bartlett, Laila Rashidi, Liu Yu, Bill Gawkins, Piet Hinoul, Bill Peine, Yanghee Woo, Mustafa Raoof, Daniel Jones, Supriya Deshpande, Jordana Bernard, Yulun Wang, Dieter C. Broering, Pier Cristoforo Giulianotti
*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

Abstract

Background: Implementation of remote robotic-assisted surgery (rRAS) has the potential to significantly improve access to high-quality surgical care for patients worldwide. Advances in robotic systems and telecommunications now enable highly reliable, low latency, and cybersecure connectivity. These technological developments, together with the broader adoption of telemedicine, have driven an increasing interest in the implementation of rRAS. Methods: The Clinical Robotic Surgery Association (CRSA) convened a conference to develop international clinical recommendations for rRAS using the Danish Model of Consensus. The society identified five key issue categories and invited a panel of experts to address specific questions for each. Panel members and a jury of 10 unbiased, non-expert in rRAS professionals participated in a day-long conference on November 19, 2025 (Los Angeles, USA). During the conference, participants presented, discussed, and reached consensus on specific guidelines relevant to each category. Immediately after the conference, the jury reviewed and approved the recommended guidelines. Results: Multiple recommendations were approved for each of the following categories: Operating Models, Roles and Responsibilities (2 recommendations), Clinical Pathway (2 recommendations), Emergency Management (8 recommendations), Technical Considerations (5 recommendations), and Medico-legal and Ethical Considerations (4 recommendations). Conclusions: There was consensus that with recent advances in telecommunication and robotic technologies, rRAS can be offered safely and effectively if the identified safeguards are realized. Adoption of rRAS is expected to continue advancing rapidly.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)2274-2288
Number of pages15
JournalWorld journal of surgery
Volume50
Issue number8
Early online date14 Jul 2026
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Aug 2026

Keywords

  • danish model of consensus
  • medical ethics
  • regulatory approval
  • remote robotic surgery
  • remote surgery
  • review
  • robotic workflow
  • robotic-assisted surgery
  • telesurgery

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Clinical Recommendations for Remote Robotic Assisted Surgery From the CRSA 2025 International Consensus Conference'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this