TY - JOUR
T1 - Classification of rheumatoid arthritis into active or inactive with a modified Disease Activity score, for future use as a treat-to-target tool, with a HandScan score replacing joint counts
AU - Verhoeven, Maxime M.A.
AU - Westgeest, Anton A.A.
AU - Tekstra, Janneke
AU - van Laar, Jacob M.
AU - Lafeber, Floris P.J.G.
AU - Welsing, Paco M.J.
AU - Jacobs, Johannes W.G.
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2022 Clinical and Experimental Rheumatology S.A.S.. All rights reserved.
PY - 2022/11/1
Y1 - 2022/11/1
N2 - Objective To establish the value of a modified Disease Activity score with Optical Spectral Transmission score (DAS-OST) without joint counts but with a HandScan score, versus that of DAS28, to classify rheumatoid arthritis (RA) as active versus inactive, with as reference standard the rheumatologist’s clinical classification. Methods RA patients with at least one HandScan and DAS28 measurement performed at the same visit were included. Data was extracted from medical records, as was the clinical interpretation as active or inactive RA by the rheumatologist. Logistic regression analyses were performed to calculate areas under the receiver operating characteristics (AU-ROC) curves. The clinical interpretation was used as reference standard in all analyses, and disease activity measures were used as predictor variables. The performance of predictor variables (AU-ROCs) was compared. Results The data of 1505 RA patients were used for analyses. The highest AU-ROC of 0.88 (95%CI 0.85–0.90) was shown for DAS28; AU-ROC of DAS-OST was 0.78 (95%CI 0.75–0.81), difference 0.10, p<0.01. Conclusion Compared to DAS28, DAS-OST classified RA statistically significantly less well as active versus inactive, when using the clinical classification as reference standard. However, a DAS-modification without joint scores might have a place in strategies limiting routine outpatients’visits to the rheumatologist.
AB - Objective To establish the value of a modified Disease Activity score with Optical Spectral Transmission score (DAS-OST) without joint counts but with a HandScan score, versus that of DAS28, to classify rheumatoid arthritis (RA) as active versus inactive, with as reference standard the rheumatologist’s clinical classification. Methods RA patients with at least one HandScan and DAS28 measurement performed at the same visit were included. Data was extracted from medical records, as was the clinical interpretation as active or inactive RA by the rheumatologist. Logistic regression analyses were performed to calculate areas under the receiver operating characteristics (AU-ROC) curves. The clinical interpretation was used as reference standard in all analyses, and disease activity measures were used as predictor variables. The performance of predictor variables (AU-ROCs) was compared. Results The data of 1505 RA patients were used for analyses. The highest AU-ROC of 0.88 (95%CI 0.85–0.90) was shown for DAS28; AU-ROC of DAS-OST was 0.78 (95%CI 0.75–0.81), difference 0.10, p<0.01. Conclusion Compared to DAS28, DAS-OST classified RA statistically significantly less well as active versus inactive, when using the clinical classification as reference standard. However, a DAS-modification without joint scores might have a place in strategies limiting routine outpatients’visits to the rheumatologist.
KW - HandScan
KW - disease activity
KW - inflammation
KW - optical spectral transmission
KW - rheumatoid arthritis
UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/85141890629
U2 - 10.55563/clinexprheumatol/tpsngs
DO - 10.55563/clinexprheumatol/tpsngs
M3 - Article
C2 - 35200120
AN - SCOPUS:85141890629
SN - 0392-856X
VL - 40
SP - 2018
EP - 2022
JO - Clinical and Experimental Rheumatology
JF - Clinical and Experimental Rheumatology
IS - 11
ER -