TY - JOUR
T1 - Chromatin Remodeling in Patient-Derived Colorectal Cancer Models
AU - Xiang, Kun
AU - Wang, Ergang
AU - Mantyh, John
AU - Rupprecht, Gabrielle
AU - Negrete, Marcos
AU - Sanati, Golshid
AU - Hsu, Carolyn
AU - Randon, Peggy
AU - Dohlman, Anders
AU - Kretzschmar, Kai
AU - Bose, Shree
AU - Giroux, Nicholas
AU - Ding, Shengli
AU - Wang, Lihua
AU - Balcazar, Jorge Prado
AU - Huang, Qiang
AU - Sundaramoorthy, Pasupathi
AU - Xi, Rui
AU - McCall, Shannon Jones
AU - Wang, Zhaohui
AU - Jiang, Chongming
AU - Kang, Yubin
AU - Kopetz, Scott
AU - Crawford, Gregory E.
AU - Lipkin, Steven M.
AU - Wang, Xiao Fan
AU - Clevers, Hans
AU - Hsu, David
AU - Shen, Xiling
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2024 The Authors. Advanced Science published by Wiley-VCH GmbH.
PY - 2024/4/24
Y1 - 2024/4/24
N2 - Patient-Derived Organoids (PDO) and Xenografts (PDX) are the current gold standards for patient-derived models of cancer (PDMC). Nevertheless, how patient tumor cells evolve in these models and the impact on drug response remains unclear. Herein, the transcriptomic and chromatin accessibility landscapes of matched colorectal cancer (CRC) PDO, PDX, PDO-derived PDX (PDOX), and original patient tumors (PT) are compared. Two major remodeling axes are discovered. The first axis delineates PDMC from PT, and the second axis distinguishes PDX and PDO. PDOX are more similar to PDX than PDO, indicating the growth environment is a driving force for chromatin adaptation. Transcription factors (TF) that differentially bind to open chromatins between matched PDO and PDOX are identified. Among them, KLF14 and EGR2 footprints are enriched in PDOX relative to matched PDO, and silencing of KLF14 or EGR2 promoted tumor growth. Furthermore, EPHA4, a shared downstream target gene of KLF14 and EGR2, altered tumor sensitivity to MEK inhibitor treatment. Altogether, patient-derived CRC cells undergo both common and distinct chromatin remodeling in PDO and PDX/PDOX, driven largely by their respective microenvironments, which results in differences in growth and drug sensitivity and needs to be taken into consideration when interpreting their ability to predict clinical outcome.
AB - Patient-Derived Organoids (PDO) and Xenografts (PDX) are the current gold standards for patient-derived models of cancer (PDMC). Nevertheless, how patient tumor cells evolve in these models and the impact on drug response remains unclear. Herein, the transcriptomic and chromatin accessibility landscapes of matched colorectal cancer (CRC) PDO, PDX, PDO-derived PDX (PDOX), and original patient tumors (PT) are compared. Two major remodeling axes are discovered. The first axis delineates PDMC from PT, and the second axis distinguishes PDX and PDO. PDOX are more similar to PDX than PDO, indicating the growth environment is a driving force for chromatin adaptation. Transcription factors (TF) that differentially bind to open chromatins between matched PDO and PDOX are identified. Among them, KLF14 and EGR2 footprints are enriched in PDOX relative to matched PDO, and silencing of KLF14 or EGR2 promoted tumor growth. Furthermore, EPHA4, a shared downstream target gene of KLF14 and EGR2, altered tumor sensitivity to MEK inhibitor treatment. Altogether, patient-derived CRC cells undergo both common and distinct chromatin remodeling in PDO and PDX/PDOX, driven largely by their respective microenvironments, which results in differences in growth and drug sensitivity and needs to be taken into consideration when interpreting their ability to predict clinical outcome.
KW - ATAC-seq, Colorectal Cancer (CRC)
KW - Patient-Derived Models of Cancer (PDMC)
KW - Patient-Derived Organoids (PDO)
KW - Patient-Derived Xenografts (PDX)
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85185245415&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1002/advs.202303379
DO - 10.1002/advs.202303379
M3 - Article
C2 - 38380561
AN - SCOPUS:85185245415
SN - 2198-3844
VL - 11
JO - Advanced Science
JF - Advanced Science
IS - 16
M1 - 2303379
ER -