Choice of Outcome in COVID-19 Studies and Implications for Policy: Mortality and Fatality

Daniel Westreich; Jessie K. Edwards; Peter W.G. Tennant; Eleanor J. Murray; Maarten Van Smeden

doi:10.1093/aje/kwab244

Choice of Outcome in COVID-19 Studies and Implications for Policy: Mortality and Fatality

Daniel Westreich^*, Jessie K. Edwards, Peter W.G. Tennant, Eleanor J. Murray, Maarten Van Smeden

^*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › Academic › peer-review

2 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

In this brief communication, we discuss the confusion of mortality with fatality in the interpretation of evidence in the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic, and how this confusion affects the translation of science into policy and practice. We discuss how this confusion has influenced COVID-19 policy in France, Sweden, and the United Kingdom and discuss the implications for decision-making about COVID-19 vaccine distribution. We also discuss how this confusion is an example of a more general statistical fallacy we term the "Missing Link Fallacy."

Original language	English
Pages (from-to)	282-286
Number of pages	5
Journal	American Journal of Epidemiology
Volume	191
Issue number	2
DOIs	https://doi.org/10.1093/aje/kwab244
Publication status	Published - Feb 2022

Keywords

COVID-19/mortality
Epidemiologic Studies
Health Policy
Humans
Policy Making
Risk
SARS-CoV-2
Vulnerable Populations

Access to Document

10.1093/aje/kwab244

Cite this

@article{5c543ba9422a4ae5a2094a18d689fe47,

title = "Choice of Outcome in COVID-19 Studies and Implications for Policy: Mortality and Fatality",

abstract = "In this brief communication, we discuss the confusion of mortality with fatality in the interpretation of evidence in the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic, and how this confusion affects the translation of science into policy and practice. We discuss how this confusion has influenced COVID-19 policy in France, Sweden, and the United Kingdom and discuss the implications for decision-making about COVID-19 vaccine distribution. We also discuss how this confusion is an example of a more general statistical fallacy we term the {"}Missing Link Fallacy.{"}",

keywords = "COVID-19/mortality, Epidemiologic Studies, Health Policy, Humans, Policy Making, Risk, SARS-CoV-2, Vulnerable Populations",

author = "Daniel Westreich and Edwards, {Jessie K.} and Tennant, {Peter W.G.} and Murray, {Eleanor J.} and {Van Smeden}, Maarten",

note = "{\textcopyright} The Author(s) 2021. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health. All rights reserved. For permissions, please e-mail: [email protected].",

year = "2022",

month = feb,

doi = "10.1093/aje/kwab244",

language = "English",

volume = "191",

pages = "282--286",

journal = "American Journal of Epidemiology",

issn = "0002-9262",

publisher = "Oxford University Press",

number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Choice of Outcome in COVID-19 Studies and Implications for Policy

T2 - Mortality and Fatality

AU - Westreich, Daniel

AU - Edwards, Jessie K.

AU - Tennant, Peter W.G.

AU - Murray, Eleanor J.

AU - Van Smeden, Maarten

N1 - © The Author(s) 2021. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health. All rights reserved. For permissions, please e-mail: [email protected].

PY - 2022/2

Y1 - 2022/2

N2 - In this brief communication, we discuss the confusion of mortality with fatality in the interpretation of evidence in the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic, and how this confusion affects the translation of science into policy and practice. We discuss how this confusion has influenced COVID-19 policy in France, Sweden, and the United Kingdom and discuss the implications for decision-making about COVID-19 vaccine distribution. We also discuss how this confusion is an example of a more general statistical fallacy we term the "Missing Link Fallacy."

AB - In this brief communication, we discuss the confusion of mortality with fatality in the interpretation of evidence in the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic, and how this confusion affects the translation of science into policy and practice. We discuss how this confusion has influenced COVID-19 policy in France, Sweden, and the United Kingdom and discuss the implications for decision-making about COVID-19 vaccine distribution. We also discuss how this confusion is an example of a more general statistical fallacy we term the "Missing Link Fallacy."

KW - COVID-19/mortality

KW - Epidemiologic Studies

KW - Health Policy

KW - Humans

KW - Policy Making

KW - Risk

KW - SARS-CoV-2

KW - Vulnerable Populations

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85120501545&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1093/aje/kwab244

DO - 10.1093/aje/kwab244

M3 - Article

C2 - 34613347

AN - SCOPUS:85120501545

SN - 0002-9262

VL - 191

SP - 282

EP - 286

JO - American Journal of Epidemiology

JF - American Journal of Epidemiology

IS - 2

ER -

Choice of Outcome in COVID-19 Studies and Implications for Policy: Mortality and Fatality

Abstract

Keywords

Access to Document

Other files and links

Fingerprint

Cite this