TY - JOUR
T1 - Child-Patient Perspective on Results after Correction of Sagittal Synostosis and the Difference between Child-Patient and Parent's Perspectives
AU - Kurniawan, Melissa S.I.C.
AU - Kamst, Nathalie W.
AU - Mathijssen, Irene M.J.
AU - Erler, Nicole S.
AU - Van Veelen, Marie Lise C.
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2024 Lippincott Williams and Wilkins. All rights reserved.
PY - 2024/6/1
Y1 - 2024/6/1
N2 - Objective: This study assesses the level of child-patient satisfaction with the surgical result after scaphocephaly correction and the difference between child-patient and parents' perspectives. Methods: A questionnaire was sent out to children between 6 and 18 years old with isolated sagittal synostosis, who had undergone either a frontobiparietal remodeling or extended strip craniotomy, and separately to their parents. Results: The questionnaire was completed by 96 patients, 81.2% of the patients considered their head to be similar or slightly different from others. Despite the majority being satisfied with the outcome, 33% would change the shape of their head if they could. Patients who underwent extended strip craniotomy wanted to change the back of their head more often (P = 0.002), whereas patients who underwent frontobiparietal remodeling wanted to change their forehead (P = 0.005). The patients' own perspective on head shape was independent of the cephalic index (CI). However, patients with a relatively narrow CI received more remarks from others about their heads (P = 0.038). Parent and child agreement was 49.7% on average. Differences between child-patients and parents were found in reporting adaptive behavior. Conclusion: The majority of patients were satisfied with the outcome of their intervention. The child's perspective seems to be a valuable addition to evaluate sagittal synostosis surgery as it is independent of the CI and differentiates between different surgical techniques. In addition, the patient's perspective is comparable to the parent's perspective, but gives more details on adaptive behavior.
AB - Objective: This study assesses the level of child-patient satisfaction with the surgical result after scaphocephaly correction and the difference between child-patient and parents' perspectives. Methods: A questionnaire was sent out to children between 6 and 18 years old with isolated sagittal synostosis, who had undergone either a frontobiparietal remodeling or extended strip craniotomy, and separately to their parents. Results: The questionnaire was completed by 96 patients, 81.2% of the patients considered their head to be similar or slightly different from others. Despite the majority being satisfied with the outcome, 33% would change the shape of their head if they could. Patients who underwent extended strip craniotomy wanted to change the back of their head more often (P = 0.002), whereas patients who underwent frontobiparietal remodeling wanted to change their forehead (P = 0.005). The patients' own perspective on head shape was independent of the cephalic index (CI). However, patients with a relatively narrow CI received more remarks from others about their heads (P = 0.038). Parent and child agreement was 49.7% on average. Differences between child-patients and parents were found in reporting adaptive behavior. Conclusion: The majority of patients were satisfied with the outcome of their intervention. The child's perspective seems to be a valuable addition to evaluate sagittal synostosis surgery as it is independent of the CI and differentiates between different surgical techniques. In addition, the patient's perspective is comparable to the parent's perspective, but gives more details on adaptive behavior.
KW - craniosynostosis
KW - Esthetic outcome
KW - patient-reported outcome
KW - sagittal synostosis
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85195226403&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1097/SCS.0000000000010263
DO - 10.1097/SCS.0000000000010263
M3 - Article
C2 - 38722327
AN - SCOPUS:85195226403
SN - 1049-2275
VL - 35
SP - 1040
EP - 1044
JO - Journal of Craniofacial Surgery
JF - Journal of Craniofacial Surgery
IS - 4
ER -