Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Characteristics and Reported Practices of ICUs Participating in the Sedation, Analgesia and Delirium Management International Study: Variability in Site-Level Management of Mechanically Ventilated Patients

  • Sangeeta Mehta
  • , Sherihane Bensemmane
  • , Kiyan Heybati
  • , Nanki Ahluwalia
  • , Michelle S Chew
  • , Lisa Burry
  • , Federico Carlos Carini
  • , Giuseppe Citerio
  • , Dylan deLange
  • , Ib Jammer
  • , Geert Meyfroidt
  • , Jorge Salluh
  • , Fabio Silvio Taccone
  • , Bjorn Weiss
  • , Lara Prisco
  • ,

Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › Academic › peer-review

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: – To describe site-level ICU organizational policies and implementation of pain, agitation, and delirium (PAD) best practices before the COVID-19 pandemic, and perceived changes during the pandemic. DESIGN: – International site-level questionnaire study. SETTING: – Participating sites completed a standardized electronic Case Report Form between January 5, 2022 and March 31, 2023. PATIENTS/CENTERS: – Ninety-three ICUs caring for adult patients from 79 hospitals across 27 countries in North America, South America, and Europe. INTERVENTIONS: – Each ICU submitted data on site characteristics, staffing, implementation of PAD protocols and assessment tools prepandemic, and perceived changes during the COVID-19 pandemic. Descriptive statistics and multivariable logistic regressions were performed using R. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: – Of 93 ICUs, 63% were university-affiliated, and 59% reported a closed physician staffing model. Most managed mixed patient populations (78%), with a nurse-to-patient ratio for ventilated patients of 1:2 (45%) or 1:1 (39%). Physiotherapists and pharmacists were available in 83% and 68% of ICUs, respectively. Over 75% reported routine use of validated PAD scales, most commonly Richmond Agitation Sedation Scale (86%), Confusion Assessment Method for ICU (59%), and Numeric Rating Scale (44%). Protocols were most available for spontaneous breathing trials (60%) and sedation (58%), followed by delirium (53%), mobilization (47%), and pain (46%). University affiliation and 1:1 nurse staffing was associated with reported use of delirium or mobilization protocols. The presence of a weaning protocol was associated with higher odds of daily sedation interruption (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] 3.80; 95% CI, 1.43–10.89; p = 0.009), and use of sedation protocols (aOR 5.95; 95% CI, 2.29–16.86; p < 0.001). Nearly one-half of ICUs reported drug shortages during the pandemic, and 62% prohibited any visitation. CONCLUSIONS: – ICU organizational structures and reported PAD practices vary widely worldwide. Despite international guidelines, many ICUs lack consistent implementation of evidence-based sedation, analgesia, and delirium management strategies.

Original languageEnglish
Article numbere1479
JournalCritical care explorations
Volume8
Issue number9
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Sept 2026

Keywords

  • Analgesia/methods
  • COVID-19/epidemiology
  • Delirium/therapy
  • Europe
  • Humans
  • Hypnotics and Sedatives/therapeutic use
  • Intensive Care Units/organization & administration
  • North America
  • Pain Management/methods
  • Psychomotor Agitation
  • Respiration, Artificial/methods
  • SARS-CoV-2
  • South America
  • Surveys and Questionnaires

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Characteristics and Reported Practices of ICUs Participating in the Sedation, Analgesia and Delirium Management International Study: Variability in Site-Level Management of Mechanically Ventilated Patients'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this