Cervical ultrasonography has no additional value over negative 18F-FDG PET/CT scans for diagnosing cervical lymph node metastases in patients with oesophageal cancer

Lucas Goense, Jihane Meziani, Peter S.N. van Rossum, Frank J. Wessels, Marnix G.E.H. Lam, Richard van Hillegersberg, Jelle P. Ruurda*

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

Abstract

Objectives: To investigate the additional value of cervical ultrasonography over 18F-FDG PET/CT for diagnosing cervical lymph node metastases in patients with newly diagnosed oesophageal cancer. Methods: Between January 2013 and January 2016, 163 patients with newly diagnosed oesophageal cancer underwent both cervical ultrasonography and 18F-FDG PET/CT at a tertiary referral centre in the Netherlands. Retrospective clinical data analysis was performed to assess the diagnostic value of cervical ultrasonography and 18F-FDG PET/CT for the detection of cervical lymph node metastases. Fine needle aspiration or clinical follow-up was used as reference standard. Results: The overall incidence of patients with cervical lymph node metastases was 14%. The sensitivity of 18F-FDG PET/CT to detect cervical lymph node metastases was 82% (95% CI 59–94%) and specificity was 91% (95% CI 85–95%). The sensitivity and specificity of cervical ultrasonography were 73% (95% CI 50–88%) and 84% (95% CI 77–90%), respectively. In patients with a negative 18F-FDG PET/CT, 12 of 133 (9%) patients had suspicious nodes on cervical ultrasonography. In all these 12 patients the nodes were confirmed benign. Conclusions: Cervical ultrasonography has no additional diagnostic value to a negative integrated 18F-FDG PET/CT for the detection of cervical lymph node metastases in patients with newly diagnosed oesophageal cancer. Key Points: • Cervical ultrasonography has no value over PET/CT in evaluating cervical node metastases.• PET/CT provides greater diagnostic confidence compared to cervical ultrasonography.• Cervical ultrasonography during standard diagnostic work-up may be considered unnecessary.• Cervical lesions on PET/CT require cytopathological confirmation by FNA.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)2031-2037
Number of pages7
JournalEuropean Radiology
Volume28
Issue number5
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - May 2018

Keywords

  • F-FDG positron emission tomography/computed tomography
  • Cancer staging
  • Cervical lymph node metastases
  • Cervical ultrasonography
  • Oesophageal cancer
  • Reproducibility of Results
  • Humans
  • Ultrasonography/methods
  • Male
  • Neck/pathology
  • Lymph Nodes/diagnostic imaging
  • Lymphatic Metastasis/pathology
  • Esophageal Neoplasms/pathology
  • Sensitivity and Specificity
  • Female
  • Fluorodeoxyglucose F18
  • Aged
  • Retrospective Studies
  • Positron Emission Tomography Computed Tomography/methods
  • Radiopharmaceuticals
  • Cervical lymphnode metastases
  • F-18-FDG positron emission tomography/computed tomography

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Cervical ultrasonography has no additional value over negative 18F-FDG PET/CT scans for diagnosing cervical lymph node metastases in patients with oesophageal cancer'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this