Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Cecal carcinoma: A different colon malignancy?

  • Loek P.H. Leenen*
  • , Theo Wobbes
  • , Harold J. Hoekstra
  • , Chris Van Der Werken
  • *Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

3 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Cecal carcinoma has been associated with a poorer prognosis than other colon carcinomas because of the presumed longstanding obscure symptoms. In a combined study of three Dutch hospitals, a total of 166 patients with cecal carcinoma were evaluated after right hemicolectomy. Special emphasis was placed on clinical symptoms related to advanced tumor growth, e.g., pain, anemia, and palpable mass. These factors and clinicopathological staging were evaluated with aid of the Cox regression model. Ninety percent of the resected specimens contained a Dukes' B or C carcinoma. Only 5% were found to have widespread metastatic disease. Overall 5 year survival rate was found to be 0.57. No statistically significant relation to pain or palpable mass was found. Anemia, however, was related to a better survival, especially in patients with a Dukes' B carcinoma. Clinicopathological staging according to Dukes' is closely related to survival. It is concluded that carcinoma of the cecum behaves similarly to other colon malignancies.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)171-175
Number of pages5
JournalJournal of Surgical Oncology
Volume44
Issue number3
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Jul 1990
Externally publishedYes

Keywords

  • multivariate analysis
  • prognostic factors
  • right hemicolectomy

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Cecal carcinoma: A different colon malignancy?'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this