TY - JOUR
T1 - Cartesian vs radial MR-STAT
T2 - An efficiency and robustness study
AU - van der Heide, Oscar
AU - Sbrizzi, Alessandro
AU - van den Berg, Cornelis A.T.
N1 - Funding Information:
Funding: This work was supported by the Dutch Technology In Foundation [grant number 17986].
Funding Information:
The authors would like to thank Tom Bruijnen and Mariya Doneva for fruitful discussions regarding the experimental setup and interpretation of the results and Jordi Kleinloog for assisting with image segmentation. This research has been financed by the Dutch Technology Foundation under grant #17986. ☆ Funding: This work was supported by the Dutch Technology In Foundation [grant number 17986].
Publisher Copyright:
© 2023 The Authors
PY - 2023/6
Y1 - 2023/6
N2 - MR Spin TomogrAphy in Time-domain (“MR-STAT”) is quantitative MR technique in which multiple quantitative parameters are estimated from a single short scan by solving a large-scale non-linear optimization problem. In this work we extended the MR-STAT framework to non-Cartesian gradient trajectories. Cartesian MR-STAT and radial MR-STAT were compared in terms of time-efficiency and robustness in simulations, gel phantom measurements and in vivo measurements. In simulations, we observed that both Cartesian and radial MR-STAT are highly robust against undersampling. Radial MR-STAT does have a lower spatial encoding power because the outer corners of k-space are never sampled. However, especially in T2, this is compensated by a higher dynamic encoding power that comes from sampling the k-space center with each readout. In gel phantom measurements, Cartesian MR-STAT was observed to be robust against overfitting whereas radial MR-STAT suffered from high-frequency artefacts in the parameter maps at later iterations. These artefacts are hypothesized to be related to hardware imperfections and were (partially) suppressed with image filters. The time-efficiencies were higher for Cartesian MR-STAT in all vials. In-vivo, the radial reconstruction again suffered from overfitting artefacts. The robustness of Cartesian MR-STAT over the entire range of experiments may make it preferable in a clinical setting, despite radial MR-STAT resulting in a higher T1 time-efficiency in white matter.
AB - MR Spin TomogrAphy in Time-domain (“MR-STAT”) is quantitative MR technique in which multiple quantitative parameters are estimated from a single short scan by solving a large-scale non-linear optimization problem. In this work we extended the MR-STAT framework to non-Cartesian gradient trajectories. Cartesian MR-STAT and radial MR-STAT were compared in terms of time-efficiency and robustness in simulations, gel phantom measurements and in vivo measurements. In simulations, we observed that both Cartesian and radial MR-STAT are highly robust against undersampling. Radial MR-STAT does have a lower spatial encoding power because the outer corners of k-space are never sampled. However, especially in T2, this is compensated by a higher dynamic encoding power that comes from sampling the k-space center with each readout. In gel phantom measurements, Cartesian MR-STAT was observed to be robust against overfitting whereas radial MR-STAT suffered from high-frequency artefacts in the parameter maps at later iterations. These artefacts are hypothesized to be related to hardware imperfections and were (partially) suppressed with image filters. The time-efficiencies were higher for Cartesian MR-STAT in all vials. In-vivo, the radial reconstruction again suffered from overfitting artefacts. The robustness of Cartesian MR-STAT over the entire range of experiments may make it preferable in a clinical setting, despite radial MR-STAT resulting in a higher T1 time-efficiency in white matter.
KW - Efficiency analysis
KW - MR-STAT
KW - Non-linear optimization
KW - Quantitative MR
KW - Radial MRI
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85147314016&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.mri.2023.01.017
DO - 10.1016/j.mri.2023.01.017
M3 - Article
C2 - 36709010
AN - SCOPUS:85147314016
SN - 0730-725X
VL - 99
SP - 7
EP - 19
JO - Magnetic Resonance Imaging
JF - Magnetic Resonance Imaging
ER -