Carotid Intima-Media Thickness Progression and Risk of Vascular Events in People With Diabetes: Results From the PROG-IMT Collaboration

Matthias W. Lorenz*, Jackie F. Price, Christine Robertson, Michiel L. Bots, Joseph F. Polak, Holger Poppert, Maryam Kavousi, Marcus Doerr, Eva Stensland, Pierre Ducimetiere, Kimmo Ronkainen, Stefan Kiechl, Matthias Sitzer, Tatjana Rundek, Lars Lind, Jing Liu, Goran Bergstrom, Liliana Grigore, Lena Bokemark, Alfonsa FrieraDavid Yanez, Horst Bickel, M. Arfan Ikram, Henry Voelzke, Stein Harald Johnsen, Jean Philippe Empana, Tomi-Pekka Tuomainen, Peter Willeit, Helmuth Steinmetz, Moise Desvarieux, Wuxiang Xie, Caroline Schmidt, Giuseppe D. Norata, Carmen Suarez, Dirk Sander, Albert Hofman, Ulf Schminke, Ellisiv Mathiesen, Matthieu Plichart, Jussi Kauhanen, Johann Willeit, Ralph L. Sacco, Stela McLachlan, Dong Zhao, Bjorn Fagerberg, Alberico L. Catapano, Rafael Gabriel, Oscar H. Franco, Alpaslan Buelbuel, Frank Scheckenbach, Anja Pflug, Lu Gao, Simon G. Thompson

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

Abstract

OBJECTIVECarotid intima-media thickness (CIMT) is a marker of subclinical organ damage and predicts cardiovascular disease (CVD) events in the general population. It has also been associated with vascular risk in people with diabetes. However, the association of CIMT change in repeated examinations with subsequent CVD events is uncertain, and its use as a surrogate end point in clinical trials is controversial. We aimed at determining the relation of CIMT change to CVD events in people with diabetes.RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODSIn a comprehensive meta-analysis of individual participant data, we collated data from 3,902 adults (age 33-92 years) with type 2 diabetes from 21 population-based cohorts. We calculated the hazard ratio (HR) per standard deviation (SD) difference in mean common carotid artery intima-media thickness (CCA-IMT) or in CCA-IMT progression, both calculated from two examinations on average 3.6 years apart, for each cohort, and combined the estimates with random-effects meta-analysis.RESULTSAverage mean CCA-IMT ranged from 0.72 to 0.97 mm across cohorts in people with diabetes. The HR of CVD events was 1.22 (95% CI 1.12-1.33) per SD difference in mean CCA-IMT, after adjustment for age, sex, and cardiometabolic risk factors. Average mean CCA-IMT progression in people with diabetes ranged between -0.09 and 0.04 mm/year. The HR per SD difference in mean CCA-IMT progression was 0.99 (0.91-1.08).CONCLUSIONSDespite reproducing the association between CIMT level and vascular risk in subjects with diabetes, we did not find an association between CIMT change and vascular risk. These results do not support the use of CIMT progression as a surrogate end point in clinical trials in people with diabetes.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1921-1929
Number of pages9
JournalDiabetes Care
Volume38
Issue number10
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Oct 2015

Keywords

  • IMPAIRED GLUCOSE-TOLERANCE
  • CORONARY-HEART-DISEASE
  • NONFATAL MYOCARDIAL-INFARCTION
  • ARTERY INTIMA
  • CARDIOVASCULAR EVENTS
  • SUBCLINICAL ATHEROSCLEROSIS
  • META-REGRESSION
  • METAANALYSIS
  • COHORT
  • INDIVIDUALS

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Carotid Intima-Media Thickness Progression and Risk of Vascular Events in People With Diabetes: Results From the PROG-IMT Collaboration'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this