Breast cancer risk after recent childbirth: A pooled analysis of 15 prospective studies

Hazel B. Nichols*, Minouk J. Schoemaker, Jianwen Cai, Jiawei Xu, Lauren B. Wright, Mark N. Brook, Michael E. Jones, Hans Olov Adami, Laura Baglietto, Kimberly A. Bertrand, William J. Blot, Marie Christine Boutron-Ruault, Miren Dorronsoro, Laure Dossus, A. Heather Eliassen, Graham G. Giles, Inger T. Gram, Susan E. Hankinson, Judy Hoffman-Bolton, Rudolf KaaksTimothy J. Key, Cari M. Kitahara, Susanna C. Larsson, Martha Linet, Melissa A. Merritt, Roger L. Milne, Valeria Pala, Julie R. Palmer, Petra H. Peeters, Elio Riboli, Malin Sund, Rulla M. Tamimi, Anne Tjønneland, Antonia Trichopoulou, Giske Ursin, Lars Vatten, Kala Visvanathan, Elisabete Weiderpass, Alicja Wolk, Wei Zheng, Clarice R. Weinberg, Anthony J. Swerdlow, Dale P. Sandler

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

12 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Background: Parity is widely recognized as protective for breast cancer, but breast cancer risk may be increased shortly after childbirth. Whether this risk varies with breastfeeding, family history of breast cancer, or specific tumor subtype has rarely been evaluated. Objective: To characterize breast cancer risk in relation to recent childbirth. Design: Pooled analysis of individual-level data from 15 prospective cohort studies. Setting: The international Premenopausal Breast Cancer Collaborative Group. Participants: Women younger than 55 years. Measurements: During 9.6 million person-years of follow-up, 18 826 incident cases of breast cancer were diagnosed. Hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% CIs for breast cancer were calculated using Cox proportional hazards regression. Results: Compared with nulliparous women, parous women had an HR for breast cancer that peaked about 5 years after birth (HR, 1.80 [95% CI, 1.63 to 1.99]) before decreasing to 0.77 (CI, 0.67 to 0.88) after 34 years. The association crossed over from positive to negative about 24 years after birth. The overall pattern was driven by estrogen receptor (ER)-positive breast cancer; no crossover was seen for ER-negative cancer. Increases in breast cancer risk after childbirth were pronounced when combined with a family history of breast cancer and were greater for women who were older at first birth or who had more births. Breastfeeding did not modify overall risk patterns. Limitations: Breast cancer diagnoses during pregnancy were not uniformly distinguishable from early postpartum diagnoses. Data on human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) oncogene overexpression were limited. Conclusion: Compared with nulliparous women, parous women have an increased risk for breast cancer for more than 20 years after childbirth. Health care providers should consider recent childbirth a risk factor for breast cancer in young women.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)22-30
Number of pages9
JournalAnnals of Internal Medicine
Volume170
Issue number1
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Jan 2019

Keywords

  • Adolescent
  • Adult
  • Breast Feeding
  • Breast Neoplasms/diagnosis
  • Female
  • Genetic Predisposition to Disease
  • Humans
  • Maternal Age
  • Middle Aged
  • Parity
  • Parturition
  • Pregnancy
  • Premenopause
  • Proportional Hazards Models
  • Prospective Studies
  • Receptors, Estrogen/analysis
  • Risk Factors
  • Young Adult

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Breast cancer risk after recent childbirth: A pooled analysis of 15 prospective studies'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this