Breaking Bad News to Learners: How Well Does the SPIKES Clinical Model Translate?

Lynnea M. Mills*, Olle Ten Cate, Christy Boscardin, Patricia S. O'Sullivan

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalComment/Letter to the editorAcademicpeer-review

Abstract

When health professions learners do not meet standards on assessments, educators need to share this information with the learners and determine next steps to improve their performance. Those conversations can be difficult, and educators may lack confidence or skill in holding them. For clinician-educators with experience sharing challenging news with patients, using an analogy from clinical settings may help with these conversations in the education context. One common model in the clinical setting for 'breaking bad news' to patients is SPIKES: Set-up, Perception, Invitation, Knowledge, Emotion, and Summary/Strategy. The authors reviewed evidence in the education setting, particularly from the remediation literature, to consider how the SPIKES model might translate from clinical settings to those in which educators must share 'bad news' with learners about their academic performance. Based on available guidelines and evidence, the authors advocate that the SPIKES model can serve as a useful framework to help educators incorporate, by way of analogy, key components into these conversations, and increase the likelihood of successful outcomes.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)684-692
Number of pages9
JournalPerspectives on medical education
Volume13
Issue number1
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 27 Dec 2024

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Breaking Bad News to Learners: How Well Does the SPIKES Clinical Model Translate?'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this