Biodegradable versus durable polymer drug eluting stents in coronary artery disease: Insights from a meta-analysis of 5834 patients

Background

Biodegradable polymer drug eluting stents (BP-DES) have been developed to overcome the limitations of first generation durable polymer DES (DP-DES) but the clinical results of different BP-DES are not consistent. We performed a meta-analysis to compare the outcomes of BP-DES and DP-DES in the treatment of coronary artery disease (CAD).

Methods and results

Online databases including MEDLINE were searched for studies comparing BP-DES and DP-DES for obstructive CAD that reported rates for overall mortality, myocardial infarction (MI), late stent thrombosis (LST), target lesion revascularization (TLR) and late lumen loss (LLL) with a follow-up of >= 6 months. Ten studies (5834 patients) with a 1-year median follow-up were included in the meta-analysis. When comparing patients treated with DP-DES and BP-DES those treated with BP-DES had lower LLL (in-stent: weighted mean difference (WMD) -0.10 mm, 95% CI = -0.17 to -0.03 mm, p = 0.004; in-segment: WMD -0.06 mm, 95% CI = -0.10 to -0.01 mm, p = 0.01) with lower TLR rates (OR 0.67, 95% CI = 0.47 to 0.98, p = 0.04). However, BP-DES did not improve mortality (OR 0.97, 95% CI = 0.73 to 1.29, p = 0.83), MI (OR 1.13, 95% CI = 0.87 to 1.46, p = 0.36) or LST rates (OR 0.64, 95% CI = 0.36 to 1.16, p = 0.14). A pre-specified subgroup analysis of Biolimus BP-DES confirmed significant LLL reduction without differences in other clinical endpoints. Meta-regression analysis demonstrated a strong significant inverse correlation between LLL and reference coronary diameter (p <0.001).

Conclusions

Our present meta-analysis showed that BP-DES when compared with DP-DES significantly reduced LLL and TVR but without clear benefits on mortality, MI and LST rates. (Clinicaltrials.gov identifier: NCT01466634).